{"id":836582,"date":"2026-05-05T01:21:52","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T23:21:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/"},"modified":"2026-05-05T01:21:52","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T23:21:52","slug":"acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ANA CRISTINA CARVALHO. I ? Do julgamento efectuado pelo Tribunal sobre a consist?ncia dos pressupostos em que se fundamentou a AT para a avalia??o da mat?ria tribut?vel por m?todos indirectos, n?o decorre necessariamente a prova de que a sua concreta quantifica??o est? correcta e n?o padece de excesso, por se poder configurar a hip?tese de, provados os pressupostos para o recurso a avalia??o indirecta, a sua quantifica??o se apresentar desadequada e irrazo?vel em fun??o dos elementos dispon?veis, ou adequada e razo?vel, podendo o contribuinte infirm?-la demonstrando a sua despropor??o com provas concretas que conduzam a tal conclus?o; II &#8212; Alegando o impugnante que existia excesso de quantifica??o, cabia-lhe provar esse excesso; III &#8212; A escolha de um dos m?todos de quantifica??o que o legislador elencou no artigo 90.?, n.? 1, da LGT, cabe ? AT devendo revelar-se o mais adequado a permitir a maior aproxima??o poss?vel ? verdadeira situa??o tribut?ria do contribuinte, admitindo-se no resultado a que conduz, uma margem de erro que n?o seja manifesta.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtca.nsf\/170589492546a7fb802575c3004c6d7d\/7ba475361bf1e5b780258d57005bedf8?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ANA CRISTINA CARVALHO. I ? Do julgamento efectuado pelo Tribunal sobre a consist?ncia dos pressupostos em que se fundamentou a AT para a avalia??o da mat?ria tribut?vel por m?todos indirectos, n?o decorre necessariamente a prova de que a sua concreta quantifica??o est? correcta e n?o padece de excesso, por se poder configurar a hip?tese de, provados os pressupostos para o recurso a avalia??o indirecta, a sua quantifica??o se apresentar desadequada e irrazo?vel em fun??o dos elementos dispon?veis, ou adequada e razo?vel, podendo o contribuinte infirm?-la demonstrando a sua despropor??o com provas concretas que conduzam a tal conclus?o; II &#8212; Alegando o impugnante que existia excesso de quantifica??o, cabia-lhe provar esse excesso; III &#8212; A escolha de um dos m?todos de quantifica??o que o legislador elencou no artigo 90.?, n.? 1, da LGT, cabe ? AT devendo revelar-se o mais adequado a permitir a maior aproxima??o poss?vel ? verdadeira situa??o tribut?ria do contribuinte, admitindo-se no resultado a que conduz, uma margem de erro que n?o seja manifesta.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[65418],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[46438,23465,7636,66287],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-836582","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-administrativo","kji_keyword-central","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_keyword-tribut","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANA CRISTINA CARVALHO. I ? Do julgamento efectuado pelo Tribunal sobre a consist?ncia dos pressupostos em que se fundamentou a AT para a avalia??o da mat?ria tribut?vel por m?todos indirectos, n?o decorre necessariamente a prova de que a sua concreta quantifica??o est? correcta e n?o padece de excesso, por se poder configurar a hip?tese de, provados os pressupostos para o recurso a avalia??o indirecta, a sua quantifica??o se apresentar desadequada e irrazo?vel em fun??o dos elementos dispon?veis, ou adequada e razo?vel, podendo o contribuinte infirm?-la demonstrando a sua despropor??o com provas concretas que conduzam a tal conclus?o; II - Alegando o impugnante que existia excesso de quantifica??o, cabia-lhe provar esse excesso; III - A escolha de um dos m?todos de quantifica??o que o legislador elencou no artigo 90.?, n.? 1, da LGT, cabe ? AT devendo revelar-se o mais adequado a permitir a maior aproxima??o poss?vel ? verdadeira situa??o tribut?ria do contribuinte, admitindo-se no resultado a que conduz, uma margem de erro que n?o seja manifesta.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\\\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-04T23:21:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\\\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27","og_description":"Relator: ANA CRISTINA CARVALHO. I ? Do julgamento efectuado pelo Tribunal sobre a consist?ncia dos pressupostos em que se fundamentou a AT para a avalia??o da mat?ria tribut?vel por m?todos indirectos, n?o decorre necessariamente a prova de que a sua concreta quantifica??o est? correcta e n?o padece de excesso, por se poder configurar a hip?tese de, provados os pressupostos para o recurso a avalia??o indirecta, a sua quantifica??o se apresentar desadequada e irrazo?vel em fun??o dos elementos dispon?veis, ou adequada e razo?vel, podendo o contribuinte infirm?-la demonstrando a sua despropor??o com provas concretas que conduzam a tal conclus?o; II - Alegando o impugnante que existia excesso de quantifica??o, cabia-lhe provar esse excesso; III - A escolha de um dos m?todos de quantifica??o que o legislador elencou no artigo 90.?, n.? 1, da LGT, cabe ? AT devendo revelar-se o mais adequado a permitir a maior aproxima??o poss?vel ? verdadeira situa??o tribut?ria do contribuinte, admitindo-se no resultado a que conduz, uma margem de erro que n?o seja manifesta.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-04T23:21:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-central-administrativo-sul-processo-66-08-5bectb-2025-11-27\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul \u2013 Processo 66\/08.5BECTB \u2013 2025-11-27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/836582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=836582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=836582"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=836582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}