{"id":844130,"date":"2026-05-06T00:24:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-05T22:24:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/"},"modified":"2026-05-06T00:24:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T22:24:16","slug":"cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 32 \/ 16. du 24.3.2016.<\/p>\n

Num\u00e9ro 3628 du registre.<\/p>\n

Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-quatre mars deux mille sei ze.<\/p>\n

Composition:<\/p>\n

Georges SANTER, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Ir\u00e8ne FOLSCHEID, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marie- Laure MEYER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Marc HARPES, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n

Entre:<\/p>\n

X, \u00e9pouse Y , demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demander esse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Joram MOYAL , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

et:<\/p>\n

la CAISSE NATIONALE D\u2019ASSURANCE PENSION, \u00e9tablissement public, \u00e9tablie \u00e0 L-1724 Luxembourg, 1A, boulevard Prince Henri, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sident de son comit\u00e9 de direction, inscrit e au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro J35,<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par M a\u00eetre Marc THEWES, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu.<\/p>\n

=======================================================<\/p>\n

2 LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 rendu le 4 mai 2015 sous le num\u00e9ro 2015\/0110 (No. du reg. : PDIV 2014\/0175) par le Conseil sup\u00e9rieur de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 11 ao\u00fbt 2015 par X, \u00e9pouse Y , \u00e0 la CAISSE NATIONALE D\u2019ASSURANCE PENSION, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 12 ao\u00fbt 2015 ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 6 octobre 2015 par la CAISSE NATIONALE D\u2019ASSURANCE PENSION \u00e0 X, \u00e9pouse Y , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 8 octobre 2015 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du pr\u00e9sident Georges SANTER et sur les conclusions du procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat adjoint Georges WIVENES ;<\/p>\n

Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi qui est contest\u00e9e :<\/p>\n

Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 du Conseil sup\u00e9rieur de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale a \u00e9t\u00e9, suivant les pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la demanderesse en cassation en personne le 13 mai 2015 ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le pourvoi en cassation, introduit par un m\u00e9moire signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation le 11 ao\u00fbt 2015, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 12 ao\u00fbt 2015, est irrecevable pour ne pas avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 introduit dans le d\u00e9lai de deux mois \u00e0 partir du jour de la notification \u00e0 personne de l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 7 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation ;<\/p>\n

Sur l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure :<\/p>\n

Attendu que la demande de la d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation en obtention d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure est \u00e0 rejeter, la condition d\u2019ini quit\u00e9 n\u2019\u00e9tant pas remplie dans son chef ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n

d\u00e9clare le pourvoi irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

d\u00e9boute la d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation de sa demande en obtention d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation, dont distraction au profit de Ma\u00eetre Marc THEWES, sur ses affirmations de droit.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Georges SANTER, en pr\u00e9sence de Monsieur Marc HARPES, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST , greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 32 \/ 16. du 24.3.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3628 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-quatre mars deux mille sei ze. Composition: Georges SANTER, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Ir\u00e8ne FOLSCHEID, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-844130","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 32 \/ 16. du 24.3.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3628 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-quatre mars deux mille sei ze. Composition: Georges SANTER, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Ir\u00e8ne FOLSCHEID, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-05T22:24:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-05T22:24:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-05T22:24:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628","og_description":"N\u00b0 32 \/ 16. du 24.3.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3628 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-quatre mars deux mille sei ze. Composition: Georges SANTER, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Ir\u00e8ne FOLSCHEID, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-05T22:24:16+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-05T22:24:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-05T22:24:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-24-mars-2016-n-0324-3628\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 24 mars 2016, n\u00b0 0324-3628"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/844130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=844130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=844130"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=844130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}