{"id":845634,"date":"2026-05-06T05:04:26","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T03:04:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/"},"modified":"2026-05-06T05:04:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T03:04:26","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: TERESA PRAZERES PAIS. &#8212; Se, ap?s a realiza??o da inscri??o de aluna em Col?gio, se constata ser imposs?vel conciliar a carga lectiva da referida aluna no col?gio com os estudos religiosos, o que fez com que procedesse ao cancelamento da inscri??o e, n?o obstante a explica??o das raz?es que levavam ao cancelamento da inscri??o &#8212; e solicitado a devolu??o das quantias pagas &#8212; , vem o Col?gio a recusar a restitui??o com fundamento em cl?usula\/disposi??o que n?o permite o reembolso da ?cl?usula levy? , importa considerar tal cl?usula NULA por configurar um desequil?brio em desfavor do requerente, o que consubstancia uma clara viola??o dos princ?pios da boa f? e, como tal, geradores da sua nulidade face ao estatu?do no art. 15?, 16? e 12? do DL n? 446\/85. &#8212; J? consubstanciando a taxa de matr?cula um elemento fundamental para a gest?o da escola o seu n?o reembolso afigura-se como leg?timo, por inexist?ncia de qualquer desequil?brio contratual. &#8212; ?A suceder o contr?rio, ? que este ?ltimo se concretizaria por defraudar as leg?timas expectativas da escola por via de um comportamento da parte contr?ria, contratualmente irrespons?vel<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/d03fd2b8416f18598025878400577913?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: TERESA PRAZERES PAIS. &#8212; Se, ap?s a realiza??o da inscri??o de aluna em Col?gio, se constata ser imposs?vel conciliar a carga lectiva da referida aluna no col?gio com os estudos religiosos, o que fez com que procedesse ao cancelamento da inscri??o e, n?o obstante a explica??o das raz?es que levavam ao cancelamento da inscri??o &#8212; e solicitado a devolu??o das quantias pagas &#8212; , vem o Col?gio a recusar a restitui??o com fundamento em cl?usula\/disposi??o que n?o permite o reembolso da ?cl?usula levy? , importa considerar tal cl?usula NULA por configurar um desequil?brio em desfavor do requerente, o que consubstancia uma clara viola??o dos princ?pios da boa f? e, como tal, geradores da sua nulidade face ao estatu?do no art. 15?, 16? e 12? do DL n? 446\/85. &#8212; J? consubstanciando a taxa de matr?cula um elemento fundamental para a gest?o da escola o seu n?o reembolso afigura-se como leg?timo, por inexist?ncia de qualquer desequil?brio contratual. &#8212; ?A suceder o contr?rio, ? que este ?ltimo se concretizaria por defraudar as leg?timas expectativas da escola por via de um comportamento da parte contr?ria, contratualmente irrespons?vel<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-845634","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: TERESA PRAZERES PAIS. - Se, ap?s a realiza??o da inscri??o de aluna em Col?gio, se constata ser imposs?vel conciliar a carga lectiva da referida aluna no col?gio com os estudos religiosos, o que fez com que procedesse ao cancelamento da inscri??o e, n?o obstante a explica??o das raz?es que levavam ao cancelamento da inscri??o - e solicitado a devolu??o das quantias pagas - , vem o Col?gio a recusar a restitui??o com fundamento em cl?usula\/disposi??o que n?o permite o reembolso da ?cl?usula levy? , importa considerar tal cl?usula NULA por configurar um desequil?brio em desfavor do requerente, o que consubstancia uma clara viola??o dos princ?pios da boa f? e, como tal, geradores da sua nulidade face ao estatu?do no art. 15?, 16? e 12? do DL n? 446\/85. - J? consubstanciando a taxa de matr?cula um elemento fundamental para a gest?o da escola o seu n?o reembolso afigura-se como leg?timo, por inexist?ncia de qualquer desequil?brio contratual. - ?A suceder o contr?rio, ? que este ?ltimo se concretizaria por defraudar as leg?timas expectativas da escola por via de um comportamento da parte contr?ria, contratualmente irrespons?vel\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\\\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-06T03:04:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\\\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21","og_description":"Relator: TERESA PRAZERES PAIS. - Se, ap?s a realiza??o da inscri??o de aluna em Col?gio, se constata ser imposs?vel conciliar a carga lectiva da referida aluna no col?gio com os estudos religiosos, o que fez com que procedesse ao cancelamento da inscri??o e, n?o obstante a explica??o das raz?es que levavam ao cancelamento da inscri??o - e solicitado a devolu??o das quantias pagas - , vem o Col?gio a recusar a restitui??o com fundamento em cl?usula\/disposi??o que n?o permite o reembolso da ?cl?usula levy? , importa considerar tal cl?usula NULA por configurar um desequil?brio em desfavor do requerente, o que consubstancia uma clara viola??o dos princ?pios da boa f? e, como tal, geradores da sua nulidade face ao estatu?do no art. 15?, 16? e 12? do DL n? 446\/85. - J? consubstanciando a taxa de matr?cula um elemento fundamental para a gest?o da escola o seu n?o reembolso afigura-se como leg?timo, por inexist?ncia de qualquer desequil?brio contratual. - ?A suceder o contr?rio, ? que este ?ltimo se concretizaria por defraudar as leg?timas expectativas da escola por via de um comportamento da parte contr?ria, contratualmente irrespons?vel","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-06T03:04:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-2262-20-8yiprt-l1-8-2021-10-21\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 2262\/20.8YIPRT.L1-8 \u2013 2021-10-21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/845634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=845634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=845634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=845634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}