{"id":1221740,"date":"2026-06-30T16:50:11","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:50:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:50:11","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-une-opposition-recevable-mais-un-controle-conteste-sur-sa-regularite\">I. Une opposition recevable mais un contr\u00f4le contest\u00e9 sur sa r\u00e9gularit\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-recevabilite-de-lopposition-a-contrainte-dans-le-delai-legal\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019opposition \u00e0 contrainte dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-confirmation-de-la-regularite-des-operations-de-controle\">B. La confirmation de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des op\u00e9rations de contr\u00f4le<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-un-redressement-fonde-sur-une-infraction-etablie-et-non-prescrite\">II. Un redressement fond\u00e9 sur une infraction \u00e9tablie et non prescrite<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lapplication-de-la-prescription-quinquennale-en-cas-de-travail-dissimule\">A. L\u2019application de la prescription quinquennale en cas de travail dissimul\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-demonstration-du-travail-dissimule-et-la-validation-de-la-contrainte\">B. La d\u00e9monstration du travail dissimul\u00e9 et la validation de la contrainte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les r\u00e8gles applicables \u00e0 la contrainte pour travail dissimul\u00e9. Un d\u00e9biteur, micro-entrepreneur dans l\u2019installation de structures m\u00e9talliques, s\u2019\u00e9tait vu notifier par l\u2019URSSAF du Nord Pas-de-Calais une contrainte d\u2019un montant de 81.798 euros au titre de cotisations et majorations pour les ann\u00e9es 2019 \u00e0 2023, \u00e0 la suite d\u2019un contr\u00f4le ayant donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 un proc\u00e8s-verbal de travail dissimul\u00e9. Il a form\u00e9 opposition le 15 octobre 2024, soit dans les quinze jours suivant la signification de la contrainte intervenue le 3 octobre 2024. Devant le tribunal, l\u2019opposant a soulev\u00e9 plusieurs moyens : l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de son audition au motif que son consentement n\u2019aurait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 recueilli, l\u2019absence de preuve de l\u2019agr\u00e9ment et de l\u2019assermentation de l\u2019inspecteur, le d\u00e9faut de production du proc\u00e8s-verbal de travail dissimul\u00e9, la prescription triennale des cotisations les plus anciennes, et, enfin, l\u2019absence d\u2019intention de dissimuler l\u2019activit\u00e9. Le tribunal a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019opposition recevable mais a rejet\u00e9 l\u2019ensemble des moyens et valid\u00e9 la contrainte. La question centrale \u00e9tait de savoir si la contrainte fond\u00e9e sur un proc\u00e8s-verbal de travail dissimul\u00e9 pouvait \u00eatre annul\u00e9e en raison d\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s de proc\u00e9dure ou de la prescription, et si la charge de la preuve pesant sur l\u2019opposant permettait d\u2019invalider le redressement. La solution retenue est claire : le contr\u00f4le est r\u00e9gulier, la prescription quinquennale s\u2019applique et le travail dissimul\u00e9 est \u00e9tabli. Il conviendra d\u2019examiner la recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019opposition et la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des op\u00e9rations de contr\u00f4le (I), puis le bien-fond\u00e9 du redressement au regard de la prescription et de la charge de la preuve (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-une-opposition-recevable-mais-un-controle-conteste-sur-sa-regularite\">I. Une opposition recevable mais un contr\u00f4le contest\u00e9 sur sa r\u00e9gularit\u00e9<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-recevabilite-de-lopposition-a-contrainte-dans-le-delai-legal\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019opposition \u00e0 contrainte dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019opposition recevable en constatant que l\u2019opposant avait saisi le p\u00f4le social le 15 octobre 2024, soit avant l\u2019expiration du d\u00e9lai de quinze jours courant \u00e0 compter de la signification de la contrainte du 3 octobre 2024. Aux termes de l\u2019article R. 133-3 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, le d\u00e9biteur peut former opposition dans les quinze jours suivant la notification ou la signification. L\u2019article 642 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile pr\u00e9cise que le d\u00e9lai expire le dernier jour \u00e0 vingt-quatre heures et qu\u2019il est prorog\u00e9 au premier jour ouvrable suivant s\u2019il expire un samedi, dimanche ou jour f\u00e9ri\u00e9. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a calcul\u00e9 que le d\u00e9lai expirait le lundi 18 octobre 2024, de sorte que l\u2019opposition form\u00e9e le 15 octobre \u00e9tait parfaitement recevable. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante rappelant que le d\u00e9lai d\u2019opposition s\u2019appr\u00e9cie conform\u00e9ment aux r\u00e8gles de computation du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. La cour d\u2019appel de Lyon a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#187; le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal d\u2019opposition arrivait \u00e0 \u00e9ch\u00e9ance le 14 novembre 2018 \u00e0 24h &#171;<\/em>, en appliquant les articles 641 et 642 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile (CA Lyon, 14 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/02465). La cour d\u2019appel de N\u00eemes a \u00e9galement pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours commence \u00e0 courir le lendemain de la notification (CA N\u00eemes, 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/02269). Le jugement comment\u00e9 ne fait donc que confirmer une r\u00e8gle bien \u00e9tablie.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-confirmation-de-la-regularite-des-operations-de-controle\">B. La confirmation de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des op\u00e9rations de contr\u00f4le<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019opposant contestait la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de son audition du 3 avril 2024, estimant que l\u2019URSSAF n\u2019avait pas recueilli son consentement pr\u00e9alable. Le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 ce moyen en relevant que le proc\u00e8s-verbal d\u2019audition, sign\u00e9 par l\u2019opposant, mentionnait express\u00e9ment qu\u2019il avait \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 des droits pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l\u2019article 61-1 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale et qu\u2019il avait consenti \u00e0 l\u2019audition. L\u2019article L. 8271-6-1 du code du travail habilite les agents de contr\u00f4le \u00e0 entendre les employeurs avec leur consentement. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la signature du proc\u00e8s-verbal et la mention expresse du consentement suffisent \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement rejet\u00e9 le moyen tir\u00e9 du d\u00e9faut de preuve de l\u2019agr\u00e9ment et de l\u2019assermentation de l\u2019inspecteur, en relevant que l\u2019URSSAF produisait une photocopie du proc\u00e8s-verbal de prestation de serment devant le tribunal d\u2019instance d\u2019Arras du 6 d\u00e9cembre 2013 et une d\u00e9cision d\u2019agr\u00e9ment du 30 septembre 2014. La Cour de cassation a pos\u00e9 que <em>&#187; l\u2019irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ou l\u2019omission de la formalit\u00e9 d\u2019agr\u00e9ment ou d\u2019assermentation prive les agents de leur pouvoir de contr\u00f4le &#171;<\/em> (2e Civ., 12 mai 2021, n\u00b020-11.941). En l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur ces documents, le tribunal a justement estim\u00e9 que le contr\u00f4le \u00e9tait r\u00e9gulier. Enfin, le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 le moyen tir\u00e9 de l\u2019absence de production du proc\u00e8s-verbal de travail dissimul\u00e9, rappelant que l\u2019article L. 133-1 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale impose seulement \u00e0 l\u2019inspecteur de remettre \u00e0 la personne contr\u00f4l\u00e9e un document constatant la situation et \u00e9valuant les cotisations, ce qui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 fait par la lettre d\u2019observations du 23 avril 2024. Aucune obligation de produire le proc\u00e8s-verbal dans le cadre du litige ne p\u00e8se sur l\u2019organisme.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-un-redressement-fonde-sur-une-infraction-etablie-et-non-prescrite\">II. Un redressement fond\u00e9 sur une infraction \u00e9tablie et non prescrite<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lapplication-de-la-prescription-quinquennale-en-cas-de-travail-dissimule\">A. L\u2019application de la prescription quinquennale en cas de travail dissimul\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019opposant soutenait que la prescription triennale de droit commun s\u2019appliquait, de sorte que les cotisations ant\u00e9rieures au 3 octobre 2021 \u00e9taient prescrites. Le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 ce raisonnement en rappelant que l\u2019article L. 244-11 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale porte le d\u00e9lai de prescription \u00e0 cinq ans en cas de constatation d\u2019une infraction de travail ill\u00e9gal par proc\u00e8s-verbal. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, un proc\u00e8s-verbal de travail dissimul\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli le 3 avril 2024 par l\u2019inspecteur asserment\u00e9. La prescription quinquennale s\u2019applique donc, et le tribunal a calcul\u00e9 que les cotisations de l\u2019ann\u00e9e 2019 se prescrivaient au 30 juin 2025, celles de 2020 au 30 juin 2026 et celles de 2021 au 30 juin 2027. Par cons\u00e9quent, la mise en demeure du 25 juin 2024 \u00e9tait intervenue avant toute expiration, et l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 des ann\u00e9es 2019 \u00e0 2023 \u00e9tait encore dans le d\u00e9lai. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la lettre de l\u2019article L. 244-11, qui subordonne la substitution de la prescription quinquennale \u00e0 la seule constatation de l\u2019infraction par proc\u00e8s-verbal, sans exiger de poursuites p\u00e9nales. Le tribunal applique strictement ce texte, ce qui permet \u00e0 l\u2019URSSAF de recouvrer les cotisations sur une p\u00e9riode plus longue.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-demonstration-du-travail-dissimule-et-la-validation-de-la-contrainte\">B. La d\u00e9monstration du travail dissimul\u00e9 et la validation de la contrainte<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 que, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article R. 133-3 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, il appartient \u00e0 l\u2019opposant \u00e0 contrainte de d\u00e9montrer le bien-fond\u00e9 de son opposition. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019opposant contestait l\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ment intentionnel du travail dissimul\u00e9. Or, le proc\u00e8s-verbal d\u2019audition r\u00e9v\u00e9lait qu\u2019\u00e0 la question de savoir s\u2019il reconnaissait l\u2019infraction, l\u2019opposant avait r\u00e9pondu : <em>&#187; Oui je reconnais cette infraction. Je vais demander des d\u00e9lais de paiement le redressement &#171;<\/em>. Il avait \u00e9galement indiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019il s\u2019engageait \u00e0 payer. Ces d\u00e9clarations, jointes aux constatations de l\u2019inspecteur, \u00e9tablissent suffisamment le travail dissimul\u00e9 par dissimulation d\u2019activit\u00e9. L\u2019opposant n\u2019a produit aucune pi\u00e8ce pour remettre en cause le montant calcul\u00e9 par l\u2019URSSAF. D\u00e8s lors, la contrainte a \u00e9t\u00e9 valid\u00e9e pour son montant total de 81.798 euros. Cette solution illustre la rigueur de la charge de la preuve pesant sur l\u2019opposant : il ne peut se contenter de contester l\u2019intention sans apporter d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs contraires. Le tribunal, en retenant les propres aveux de l\u2019opposant, fait une application classique du principe selon lequel les d\u00e9clarations faites lors d\u2019un contr\u00f4le peuvent servir de preuve, d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019audition est r\u00e9guli\u00e8re. La validation de la contrainte emporte \u00e9galement condamnation aux frais de signification et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6787524efc8e837eda8a61dc\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Lyon, le 14 janvier 2025, n\u00b022\/02465<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6780bad2f25437b69df75a80\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de N\u00eemes, le 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/02269<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006411002\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 641 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Lorsqu&#8217;un d\u00e9lai est exprim\u00e9 en jours, celui de l&#8217;acte, de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, de la d\u00e9cision ou de la notification qui le fait courir ne compte pas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Lorsqu&#8217;un d\u00e9lai est exprim\u00e9 en mois ou en ann\u00e9es, ce d\u00e9lai expire le jour du dernier mois ou de la derni\u00e8re ann\u00e9e qui porte le m\u00eame quanti\u00e8me que le jour de l&#8217;acte, de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement, de la d\u00e9cision ou de la notification qui fait courir le d\u00e9lai. A d\u00e9faut d&#8217;un quanti\u00e8me identique, le d\u00e9lai expire le dernier jour du mois.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Lorsqu&#8217;un d\u00e9lai est exprim\u00e9 en mois et en jours, les mois sont d&#8217;abord d\u00e9compt\u00e9s, puis les jours.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006411003\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 642 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Tout d\u00e9lai expire le dernier jour \u00e0 vingt-quatre heures.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Le d\u00e9lai qui expirerait normalement un samedi, un dimanche ou un jour f\u00e9ri\u00e9 ou ch\u00f4m\u00e9 est prorog\u00e9 jusqu&#8217;au premier jour ouvrable suivant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000046176941\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 133-3 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Si la mise en demeure ou l&#8217;avertissement reste sans effet au terme du d\u00e9lai d&#8217;un mois \u00e0 compter de sa notification, les directeurs des organismes cr\u00e9anciers peuvent d\u00e9cerner, dans les domaines mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 133-8-7, L. 161-1-5 ou L. 244-9, une contrainte comportant les effets mentionn\u00e9s \u00e0 ces articles. La contrainte est notifi\u00e9e au d\u00e9biteur par tout moyen permettant de rapporter la preuve de sa date de r\u00e9ception ou lui est signifi\u00e9e par acte d&#8217;huissier de justice. La contrainte est signifi\u00e9e au d\u00e9biteur par acte d&#8217;huissier de justice ou par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception. A peine de nullit\u00e9, l&#8217;acte d&#8217;huissier ou la notification mentionne la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence de la contrainte et son montant, le d\u00e9lai dans lequel l&#8217;opposition doit \u00eatre form\u00e9e, l&#8217;adresse du tribunal comp\u00e9tent et les formes requises pour sa saisine. <\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;huissier de justice avise dans les huit jours l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier de la date de signification. <\/p>\n<p>Le d\u00e9biteur peut former opposition par inscription au secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal comp\u00e9tent dans le ressort duquel il est domicili\u00e9 ou pour les d\u00e9biteurs domicili\u00e9s \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tranger, au secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal comp\u00e9tent dans le ressort de l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception adress\u00e9e au secr\u00e9tariat dudit tribunal dans les quinze jours \u00e0 compter de la notification ou de la signification. L&#8217;opposition doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e ; une copie de la contrainte contest\u00e9e doit lui \u00eatre jointe. Le secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal informe l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier dans les huit jours de la r\u00e9ception de l&#8217;opposition. <\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal, statuant sur opposition, est ex\u00e9cutoire de droit \u00e0 titre provisoire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033713061\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 244-11 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">En cas de constatation d&#8217;une infraction de travail ill\u00e9gal par proc\u00e8s-verbal, les d\u00e9lais mentionn\u00e9s aux articles L. 244-3, L. 244-8-1 et L. 244-9 sont port\u00e9s \u00e0 cinq ans.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9432,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cee280cdc6046d47e91177","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cee280cdc6046d47e91177","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cee280cdc6046d47e91177","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Valenciennes","_kj_chambre":"CTX PROTECTION SOCIALE","_kj_rg":"24\/00569","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5760\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3240\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/00569\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2038,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/00569\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/00569 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\\\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5760,\"height\":3240},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/00569\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569","og_description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5760,"height":3240,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Kohen","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"10 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/"},"wordCount":2038,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:50:11+00:00","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b0 24\/00569) appel\u00e9 \u00e0 clarifier les...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","width":5760,"height":3240},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-valenciennes-le-27-mars-2026-n24-00569\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/00569"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57Pu","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1083323,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-9-juin-2026-n25ma01081\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":0},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 9 juin 2026, n\u00b025MA01081","author":"Kohen","date":"13.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat du 9 juin 2026, la cour administrative d\u2019appel de Marseille (4\u00e8me chambre) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie du recours d\u2019un fonctionnaire de la protection...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1042460,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-marseille-le-29-mai-2026-n26ma01109\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":1},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Marseille, le 29 mai 2026, n\u00b026MA01109","author":"Kohen","date":"03.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 14 mai 2025, le tribunal administratif de Nice a annul\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision implicite de rejet n\u00e9e du silence du pr\u00e9fet des Alpes-Maritimes sur...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-GQ7ejmoWJUY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1042506,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-douai-le-28-mai-2026-n26da00596\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":2},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 28 mai 2026, n\u00b026DA00596","author":"Kohen","date":"03.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante, organisatrice de s\u00e9jours de vacances pour personnes handicap\u00e9es, b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiait d\u2019un agr\u00e9ment pr\u00e9vu par les articles R. 412-1 et...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Droit de la Famille&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Droit de la Famille","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/droit-de-la-famille\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-IJvuvpEtYg4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1083297,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-11-juin-2026-n24nc02758\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":3},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 11 juin 2026, n\u00b024NC02758","author":"Kohen","date":"13.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 11 juin 2026, la cour administrative d'appel de Nancy (3\u00e8me chambre) a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'un arr\u00eat\u00e9 pr\u00e9fectoral fixant le pays...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;CEDH&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CEDH","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cedh\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-0SYgXsw1BV4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1083308,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-11-juin-2026-n24nc01874\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":4},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 11 juin 2026, n\u00b024NC01874","author":"Kohen","date":"13.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 11 juin 2026, la cour administrative d\u2019appel de Nancy (3\u00e8me chambre) a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate d\u2019un ressortissant malien contestant le refus de titre de...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1042478,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-paris-le-29-mai-2026-n25pa00939\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221740,"position":5},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Paris, le 29 mai 2026, n\u00b025PA00939","author":"Kohen","date":"03.06.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 mai 2026, la Cour administrative d\u2019appel de Paris a rejet\u00e9 la demande d\u2019ex\u00e9cution d\u2019un jugement form\u00e9e par une agent des services...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Droit du travail&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Droit du travail","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/droit-du-travail\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221740\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}