{"id":1221741,"date":"2026-06-30T16:50:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:50:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:50:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:50:19","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-du-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-daccorder-une-provision-malgre-une\">I. L\u2019affirmation du pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019accorder une provision malgr\u00e9 une contestation sur le quantum<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rappel-des-conditions-de-mise-en-uvre-de-larticle-835-alinea-2-du-code-de-p\">A. Le rappel des conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-distinction-entre-contestation-sur-le-principe-et-contestation-sur-le-monta\">B. La distinction entre contestation sur le principe et contestation sur le montant<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-limitation-de-la-provision-au-montant-non-serieusement-contestable-par-une\">II. La limitation de la provision au montant non s\u00e9rieusement contestable par une \u00e9valuation globale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-refus-de-proceder-a-une-liquidation-poste-par-poste-du-prejudice-corporel\">A. Le refus de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une liquidation poste par poste du pr\u00e9judice corporel<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-levaluation-globale-retenue-et-la-contestation-serieuse-au-dela-de-50-000-euro\">B. L\u2019\u00e9valuation globale retenue et la contestation s\u00e9rieuse au-del\u00e0 de 50 000 euros<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un accident de la circulation \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de l\u2019assureur du v\u00e9hicule impliqu\u00e9. La victime avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 per\u00e7u deux provisions d\u2019un montant total de 7 600 euros, et sollicitait une provision compl\u00e9mentaire. L\u2019assureur, tout en reconnaissant le droit \u00e0 indemnisation sur le fondement de la loi du 5 juillet 1985, contestait le montant r\u00e9clam\u00e9 en soutenant qu\u2019il n\u2019\u00e9tait pas tenu par l\u2019offre indemnitaire qu\u2019il avait ant\u00e9rieurement formul\u00e9e \u00e0 titre transactionnel et non accept\u00e9e. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a accord\u00e9 une provision de 50 000 euros \u00e0 la victime, mais a refus\u00e9 d\u2019aller au-del\u00e0 en raison d\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur certains postes de pr\u00e9judice. La question de droit ainsi pos\u00e9e \u00e9tait de d\u00e9terminer si et dans quelle mesure le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s peut allouer une provision sur une obligation indemnitaire dont le principe est reconnu mais dont l\u2019\u00e9valuation est discut\u00e9e. La solution retenue consacre le pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019accorder une provision partielle, en retenant une \u00e9valuation globale fond\u00e9e sur les \u00e9l\u00e9ments incontestables du dossier.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-du-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-daccorder-une-provision-malgre-une\">I. L\u2019affirmation du pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d\u2019accorder une provision malgr\u00e9 une contestation sur le quantum<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rappel-des-conditions-de-mise-en-uvre-de-larticle-835-alinea-2-du-code-de-p\">A. Le rappel des conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de l\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, peut accorder une provision au cr\u00e9ancier lorsque l\u2019existence de l\u2019obligation n\u2019est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a rappel\u00e9 cette condition essentielle. Il a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9, en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant \u00e0 une d\u00e9finition constante, qu\u2019une contestation s\u00e9rieuse survient lorsque l\u2019un des moyens de d\u00e9fense oppos\u00e9 aux pr\u00e9tentions du demandeur n\u2019appara\u00eet pas imm\u00e9diatement vain et laisse subsister un doute sur le sens de la d\u00e9cision au fond. Cette d\u00e9finition a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9affirm\u00e9e par la Cour d\u2019appel de Douai dans deux d\u00e9cisions r\u00e9centes, selon lesquelles <em>&#187; la contestation s\u00e9rieuse est celle qui para\u00eet susceptible de prosp\u00e9rer au fond &#171;<\/em> et <em>&#187; l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse implique l\u2019\u00e9vidence de la solution qu\u2019appelle le point contest\u00e9 &#171;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d3ce4cbce84faca44cd7d4\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Douai, 13 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02803 ; Cour d\u2019appel de Douai, 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/03791)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge a estim\u00e9 que le principe m\u00eame de l\u2019obligation indemnitaire de l\u2019assureur n\u2019\u00e9tait pas contest\u00e9, et qu\u2019aucune faute de la victime n\u2019\u00e9tait oppos\u00e9e. Ainsi, la condition tenant \u00e0 l\u2019absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse \u00e9tait remplie s\u2019agissant du droit \u00e0 indemnisation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-distinction-entre-contestation-sur-le-principe-et-contestation-sur-le-monta\">B. La distinction entre contestation sur le principe et contestation sur le montant<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019assureur ne contestait pas le droit \u00e0 indemnisation de la victime, mais uniquement l\u2019\u00e9valuation de la somme r\u00e9clam\u00e9e. Il soutenait que son offre indemnitaire, non accept\u00e9e, ne pouvait servir de base \u00e0 la demande de provision. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a \u00e9cart\u00e9 cet argument en rappelant qu\u2019une offre transactionnelle n\u2019engage l\u2019assureur que si elle est accept\u00e9e. Toutefois, il a jug\u00e9 que le fait que l\u2019assureur reconnaisse le principe de l\u2019obligation ne l\u2019emp\u00eachait pas de contester s\u00e9rieusement le montant de la cr\u00e9ance sur certains postes de pr\u00e9judice. D\u00e8s lors, la contestation portant sur le quantum ne fait pas obstacle par elle-m\u00eame \u00e0 l\u2019octroi d\u2019une provision, mais en limite le montant \u00e0 la part non s\u00e9rieusement contestable de l\u2019obligation. Le juge a ainsi pu allouer une provision partielle, en retenant que certains chefs de pr\u00e9judice \u00e9taient d\u2019ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 incontestables. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans la logique du texte, qui n\u2019exige pas que le montant de la cr\u00e9ance soit d\u00e9termin\u00e9 avec certitude, mais que son existence ne soit pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-limitation-de-la-provision-au-montant-non-serieusement-contestable-par-une\">II. La limitation de la provision au montant non s\u00e9rieusement contestable par une \u00e9valuation globale<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-refus-de-proceder-a-une-liquidation-poste-par-poste-du-prejudice-corporel\">A. Le refus de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une liquidation poste par poste du pr\u00e9judice corporel<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a express\u00e9ment rappel\u00e9 qu\u2019il ne lui appartient pas, dans le cadre d\u2019une demande de provision, de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une liquidation du pr\u00e9judice poste par poste, cette mission relevant de la juridiction du fond. En cons\u00e9quence, il a retenu une m\u00e9thode d\u2019\u00e9valuation globale de la valeur indemnitaire du pr\u00e9judice, sur la base des \u00e9l\u00e9ments vers\u00e9s aux d\u00e9bats et des bar\u00e8mes usuels. Il s\u2019est appuy\u00e9 sur le second rapport d\u2019expertise amiable du 14 mars 2025, lequel avait fix\u00e9 la consolidation au 1er mars 2025 et \u00e9valu\u00e9 diff\u00e9rents postes de pr\u00e9judice : assistance par tierce personne, d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel temporaire, souffrances endur\u00e9es, pr\u00e9judice esth\u00e9tique temporaire, d\u00e9ficit fonctionnel permanent \u00e0 12 %, r\u00e9percussions professionnelles. Le juge a \u00e9cart\u00e9 les postes n\u00e9cessitant un examen au fond ou des justifications compl\u00e9mentaires, tels que les pertes de gains professionnels futurs ou l\u2019incidence professionnelle. Cette approche pragmatique permet d\u2019accorder une provision sans anticiper sur la d\u00e9cision du juge du fond, tout en respectant la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de celui-ci pour la liquidation d\u00e9finitive.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-levaluation-globale-retenue-et-la-contestation-serieuse-au-dela-de-50-000-euro\">B. L\u2019\u00e9valuation globale retenue et la contestation s\u00e9rieuse au-del\u00e0 de 50 000 euros<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 qu\u2019au regard de la gravit\u00e9 des l\u00e9sions et des cons\u00e9quences \u00e9tablies par l\u2019expertise, le versement d\u2019une provision de 50 000 euros apparaissait justifi\u00e9, en s\u2019en tenant aux seuls chefs de pr\u00e9judice incontestables. Il a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu\u2019au-del\u00e0 de ce montant, la demande se heurtait \u00e0 une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, car les autres postes de pr\u00e9judice n\u00e9cessitaient un examen approfondi et des pi\u00e8ces compl\u00e9mentaires. Cette limitation traduit la prudence du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, qui ne peut allouer qu\u2019une provision correspondant \u00e0 la part non s\u00e9rieusement contestable de l\u2019obligation. La somme de 50 000 euros a \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9e discr\u00e9tionnairement, \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9rieur de la limite sup\u00e9rieure que constituerait une \u00e9valuation non contestable. Le juge a \u00e9galement \u00e9cart\u00e9 la demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, au motif que la question du fond restait enti\u00e8re et que l\u2019assureur avait formul\u00e9 une proposition d\u2019indemnisation. Enfin, les d\u00e9pens ont \u00e9t\u00e9 laiss\u00e9s \u00e0 la charge provisoire de chaque partie. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la conciliation entre l\u2019urgence d\u2019une provision et le respect des comp\u00e9tences du juge du fond, en offrant \u00e0 la victime une avance substantielle sans pr\u00e9juger de l\u2019indemnisation d\u00e9finitive.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d3ce4cbce84faca44cd7d4\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 13 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02803<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6780bc707876e75543d1c58a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/03791<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000038313638\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article D. 147-16-1 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Sauf si le procureur de la R\u00e9publique d\u00e9cide, si la situation particuli\u00e8re du condamn\u00e9 le justifie, de faire application des dispositions de l&#8217;article 723-15 et de la pr\u00e9sente sous-section, celles-ci ne s&#8217;appliquent pas aux emprisonnements r\u00e9sultant d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision d&#8217;une juridiction de l&#8217;application des peines, notamment en cas de d\u00e9cision r\u00e9voquant un sursis probatoire ou une lib\u00e9ration conditionnelle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9449,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cee87bcdc6046d47e99288","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cee87bcdc6046d47e99288","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cee87bcdc6046d47e99288","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Tarascon","_kj_chambre":"REFERES","_kj_rg":"26\/00056","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5096\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3397\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00056\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1591,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00056\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00056 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5096,\"height\":3397},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/00056\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056","og_description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5096,"height":3397,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Kohen","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"8 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/"},"wordCount":1591,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:50:19+00:00","description":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de provision form\u00e9e par une victime d\u2019un...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","width":5096,"height":3397},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-tarascon-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00056\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Tarascon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00056"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arnaud-mariat-ilqys8HnQak-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57Pv","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"07.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456946,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/caa-caa-de-nantes-27-01-2026-n-26nt00167\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 26NT00167","author":"Kohen","date":"07.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-suspension rejette la demande de suspension d\u2019un arr\u00eat\u00e9 compl\u00e9mentaire modifiant les prescriptions d\u2019une autorisation...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-4fJHeKyHyX8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456901,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/caa-caa-de-nantes-27-01-2026-n-25nt02005\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT02005","author":"Kohen","date":"07.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de la cour administrative d'appel statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre une suspension prononc\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. L\u2019affaire concerne une...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456888,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01039\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01039","author":"Kohen","date":"07.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel dirig\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision....","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498688,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-27-novembre-2025-n25-01530\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01530","author":"Kohen","date":"08.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 15 janvier 2026. Le bailleur demandait l\u2019expulsion de locataires pour impay\u00e9s de...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221741,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"08.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221741"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221741\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}