{"id":1231140,"date":"2026-07-02T08:31:47","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T06:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T08:58:30","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T06:58:30","slug":"cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-face-a-lambiguite-contractuelle\">I. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s face \u00e0 l&#8217;ambig\u00fcit\u00e9 contractuelle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-linterdiction-dinterpreter-un-contrat-aux-termes-incertains\">A. L&#8217;interdiction d&#8217;interpr\u00e9ter un contrat aux termes incertains<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-caracterisation-dune-contestation-serieuse-par-lincertitude-sur-la-commune-\">B. La caract\u00e9risation d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse par l&#8217;incertitude sur la commune intention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-la-protection-du-consentement-et-les-pouvoirs-du\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur la protection du consentement et les pouvoirs du juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-sauvegarde-de-lequilibre-contractuel-face-a-une-execution-partielle\">A. La sauvegarde de l&#8217;\u00e9quilibre contractuel face \u00e0 une ex\u00e9cution partielle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-refere-provisionnel-et-lirrecevabilite-de-la-de\">B. La confirmation des limites du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provisionnel et l&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 de la demande d\u00e9finitive<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d&#8217;un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24 octobre, \u00e9tait inop\u00e9rant. L&#8217;appelant contestait pour sa part toute interpr\u00e9tation univoque du contrat, soulignant qu&#8217;aucune clause ne rendait caduque la transaction au-del\u00e0 du d\u00e9lai de six mois. La question de droit soumise \u00e0 la cour d&#8217;appel \u00e9tait de savoir si le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s peut, sans exc\u00e9der ses pouvoirs, ordonner la lib\u00e9ration d&#8217;une somme s\u00e9questr\u00e9e lorsque les stipulations contractuelles dont l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution est r\u00e9clam\u00e9e ne sont ni claires ni pr\u00e9cises. La cour a r\u00e9pondu par la n\u00e9gative, en infirmant l&#8217;ordonnance entreprise. Elle a jug\u00e9 que l&#8217;obligation de lib\u00e9rer les sommes \u00e9tait s\u00e9rieusement contestable, d\u00e8s lors que les dispositions du protocole ne permettaient pas d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avec l&#8217;\u00e9vidence requise en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 l&#8217;intention commune des parties quant \u00e0 la d\u00e9consignation automatique en cas de d\u00e9passement du d\u00e9lai. Elle a donc dit n&#8217;y avoir lieu \u00e0 r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 sur les demandes de provision et de lib\u00e9ration de la somme s\u00e9questr\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-face-a-lambiguite-contractuelle\">I. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s face \u00e0 l&#8217;ambig\u00fcit\u00e9 contractuelle<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-linterdiction-dinterpreter-un-contrat-aux-termes-incertains\">A. L&#8217;interdiction d&#8217;interpr\u00e9ter un contrat aux termes incertains<\/h3>\n<p>La cour rappelle, dans ses motifs, que <em>&#187; le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne peut proc\u00e9der \u00e0 l&#8217;interpr\u00e9tation d&#8217;un contrat dont les termes ne sont ni clairs ni pr\u00e9cis &#171;<\/em>. Cette affirmation constitue le socle du raisonnement. Elle trouve son fondement dans l&#8217;article 835 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui, en son alin\u00e9a 2, n&#8217;autorise le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e0 accorder une provision ou \u00e0 ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une obligation que si <em>&#187; l&#8217;existence de l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable &#171;<\/em>. L&#8217;\u00e9vidence exig\u00e9e rend logiquement impossible toute op\u00e9ration herm\u00e9neutique : interpr\u00e9ter, c&#8217;est dissiper un doute, et le doute est pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment ce que le r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 ne peut trancher. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le protocole d&#8217;accord du 5 avril 2024 contenait une clause (article 2.1) fixant un d\u00e9lai de six mois pour r\u00e9aliser le partage, mais nulle stipulation n&#8217;indiquait que ce d\u00e9lai \u00e9tait extinctif ou que la transaction deviendrait caduque \u00e0 son expiration. De m\u00eame, l&#8217;article 2.3 stipulait une avance en capital <em>&#187; \u00e0 valoir sur les liquidit\u00e9s devant \u00eatre per\u00e7ues par ce dernier dans le cadre du partage &#171;<\/em>, sans pr\u00e9ciser que le non-respect du d\u00e9lai emporterait lib\u00e9ration du s\u00e9questre. La cour en d\u00e9duit qu&#8217;<em>&#187; aucune disposition contractuelle ne le dit express\u00e9ment &#171;<\/em>. Le premier juge avait pourtant qualifi\u00e9 ces clauses d&#8217;<em>&#187; explicites &#171;<\/em> ; la cour d&#8217;appel op\u00e8re un contr\u00f4le s\u00e9v\u00e8re de cette qualification, montrant que la clart\u00e9 apparente n&#8217;\u00e9tait qu&#8217;une apparence trompeuse.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-caracterisation-dune-contestation-serieuse-par-lincertitude-sur-la-commune-\">B. La caract\u00e9risation d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse par l&#8217;incertitude sur la commune intention<\/h3>\n<p>La cour applique ensuite la d\u00e9finition classique de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse : elle survient lorsque <em>&#187; l&#8217;un des moyens de d\u00e9fense oppos\u00e9 aux pr\u00e9tentions du demandeur n&#8217;appara\u00eet pas imm\u00e9diatement vain et laisse subsister un doute sur le sens de la d\u00e9cision au fond &#171;<\/em>. Elle constate que le refus du partage par l&#8217;un des h\u00e9ritiers, bien que post\u00e9rieur au d\u00e9lai de six mois, n&#8217;est pas en soi d\u00e9pourvu de pertinence juridique. L&#8217;arr\u00eat souligne que <em>&#187; c&#8217;est au moment o\u00f9 la cour statue qu&#8217;elle doit appr\u00e9cier l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, le litige n&#8217;\u00e9tant pas fig\u00e9 par les positions initiales ou ant\u00e9rieures des parties &#171;<\/em>. Cette pr\u00e9cision temporelle est essentielle. Elle signifie que l&#8217;\u00e9valuation du caract\u00e8re s\u00e9rieux ou non de la contestation se fait au jour o\u00f9 le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s statue, et non \u00e0 la date de conclusion du contrat. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, l&#8217;ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 des clauses, l&#8217;absence de terme extinctif expr\u00e8s et le comportement post\u00e9rieur des parties cr\u00e9ent un doute l\u00e9gitime. La cour retient donc que <em>&#187; l&#8217;obligation de lib\u00e9rer les sommes au profit de M. [E] [O] est s\u00e9rieusement contestable &#171;<\/em>. D\u00e8s lors, elle infirme l&#8217;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 qui avait ordonn\u00e9 la lib\u00e9ration, et d\u00e9boute le demandeur de sa demande de provision compl\u00e9mentaire de 250 000 euros. Cette solution respecte strictement la division des comp\u00e9tences entre le juge de l&#8217;urgence et le juge du fond.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-la-protection-du-consentement-et-les-pouvoirs-du\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur la protection du consentement et les pouvoirs du juge<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-sauvegarde-de-lequilibre-contractuel-face-a-une-execution-partielle\">A. La sauvegarde de l&#8217;\u00e9quilibre contractuel face \u00e0 une ex\u00e9cution partielle<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat s&#8217;inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante qui refuse au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s le pouvoir de modifier l&#8217;\u00e9conomie d&#8217;un contrat en n&#8217;en ex\u00e9cutant que certaines clauses. La cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, dans une d\u00e9cision du 30 janvier 2025 (n\u00b021\/05343), avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9 que <em>&#187; c&#8217;est au regard de ces consid\u00e9rations et afin d&#8217;assurer la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique de l&#8217;acte dans l&#8217;hypoth\u00e8se o\u00f9 M. [H] r\u00e9appara\u00eetrait et contesterait l&#8217;acte de partage, qu&#8217;elle a souhait\u00e9 l&#8217;insertion d&#8217;une clause d&#8217;homologation, \u00e9tant observ\u00e9 que l&#8217;ensemble des parties avait manifest\u00e9 son accord pour l&#8217;insertion d&#8217;une telle clause dans l&#8217;acte de partage, ce qui n&#8217;est interdit par aucune disposition l\u00e9gale &#171;<\/em>. La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision va dans le m\u00eame sens : lib\u00e9rer les fonds s\u00e9questr\u00e9s au seul motif que le d\u00e9lai est d\u00e9pass\u00e9, sans v\u00e9rifier l&#8217;intention des parties quant aux cons\u00e9quences de ce d\u00e9passement, reviendrait \u00e0 ex\u00e9cuter partiellement un contrat dont l&#8217;\u00e9quilibre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pourrait \u00eatre remis en cause par l&#8217;absence de r\u00e9alisation du partage. La cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, dans un arr\u00eat du 6 mars 2025 (n\u00b024\/10510), avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 retenu que <em>&#187; dans un acte notari\u00e9 post\u00e9rieur, les parties ont entendu remettre en cause certaines stipulations du &#8216;protocole d&#8217;accord&#8217;. Celles-ci participent pourtant de son \u00e9quilibre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral en sorte que l&#8217;on ne saurait les modifier sans porter atteinte au consentement qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 exprim\u00e9 &#171;<\/em>. De mani\u00e8re comparable, la lib\u00e9ration du s\u00e9questre sans que le partage soit r\u00e9alis\u00e9 modifie l&#8217;\u00e9quilibre voulu par les parties, lesquelles avaient li\u00e9 l&#8217;avance en capital et la p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 \u00e0 la bonne fin de l&#8217;op\u00e9ration globale. En \u00e9cartant l&#8217;intervention du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, la cour prot\u00e8ge le consentement collectif exprim\u00e9 dans l&#8217;acte.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-refere-provisionnel-et-lirrecevabilite-de-la-de\">B. La confirmation des limites du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provisionnel et l&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 de la demande d\u00e9finitive<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat aborde \u00e9galement une question de comp\u00e9tence proc\u00e9durale : la demande form\u00e9e par l&#8217;appelant tendant \u00e0 la condamnation d\u00e9finitive du d\u00e9fendeur au paiement de la clause p\u00e9nale de 500 000 euros. La cour la d\u00e9clare irrecevable, au motif qu&#8217;<em>&#187; une telle demande exc\u00e8de les pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, tels que d\u00e9finis par l&#8217;article 835 alin\u00e9a 2 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9, comme n&#8217;\u00e9tant pas form\u00e9e \u00e0 titre provisionnel &#171;<\/em>. Cette solution est classique mais utile : le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne peut statuer au fond, m\u00eame pour trancher une question incidente. Si la clause p\u00e9nale se trouvait dans le m\u00eame protocole, elle n&#8217;en constitue pas moins une cr\u00e9ance distincte de celle relative au s\u00e9questre. Or, la demande de condamnation d\u00e9finitive est exclusive de la comp\u00e9tence du juge de l&#8217;urgence. En outre, la cour se prononce sur la restitution de l&#8217;avance en capital de 250 000 euros d\u00e9j\u00e0 vers\u00e9e au demandeur. Elle refuse d&#8217;ordonner une restitution sous astreinte, rappelant que <em>&#187; le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat infirmatif constitue un titre ex\u00e9cutoire permettant de poursuivre la restitution &#171;<\/em>, en se fondant sur une jurisprudence de la troisi\u00e8me chambre civile de la Cour de cassation du 15 septembre 2016 (n\u00b015-21.483). Cette solution t\u00e9moigne de la volont\u00e9 de la cour de ne pas alourdir inutilement la proc\u00e9dure. En d\u00e9finitive, l&#8217;arr\u00eat rappelle avec fermet\u00e9 que le r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 provisionnel ne saurait se transformer en un instrument d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution forc\u00e9e d&#8217;obligations dont l&#8217;existence m\u00eame est douteuse.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679c6db15dcac3ba60034f41\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 30 janvier 2025, n\u00b021\/05343<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca93d324b25cd0244327f8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/10510<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042597284\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 835 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire ou le juge des contentieux de la protection dans les limites de sa comp\u00e9tence peuvent toujours, m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, prescrire en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 les mesures conservatoires ou de remise en \u00e9tat qui s&#8217;imposent, soit pour pr\u00e9venir un dommage imminent, soit pour faire cesser un trouble manifestement illicite.<\/p>\n<p>Dans les cas o\u00f9 l&#8217;existence de l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, ils peuvent accorder une provision au cr\u00e9ancier, ou ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;obligation m\u00eame s&#8217;il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une obligation de faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d&#8217;un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4731,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f44a8acdc6046d472f1f34","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f44a8acdc6046d472f1f34","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f44a8acdc6046d472f1f34","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Aix-en-Provence","_kj_chambre":"Chambre 1-2","_kj_rg":"25\/06283","_kj_date":"2026-04-30","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1231140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d&#039;un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d&#039;un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6016\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06283\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1729,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06283\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06283 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00\",\"description\":\"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d'un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6016,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06283\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d'un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283","og_description":"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d'un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6016,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Kohen","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"8 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283","datePublished":"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/"},"wordCount":1729,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/","name":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T06:31:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-02T06:58:30+00:00","description":"Devant la cour, le demandeur \u00e0 la provision soutenait que le protocole expirait le 5 octobre 2024 et que le refus d'un autre h\u00e9ritier, exprim\u00e9 le 24...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","width":6016,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-30-avril-2026-n25-06283\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/06283"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5ah6","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":493445,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-limoges-le-7-novembre-2025-n25-00867\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Limoges, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00867","author":"Kohen","date":"08.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Limoges, le 7 novembre 2025, statue sur un divorce entre \u00e9poux de nationalit\u00e9 cambodgienne. Apr\u00e8s une proc\u00e9dure o\u00f9 le d\u00e9fendeur...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-zpqbsft1RcM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499431,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-toulouse-le-26-novembre-2025-n2024j00619\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Toulouse, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b02024J00619","author":"Kohen","date":"08.04.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant le 10 octobre 2023, examine un litige n\u00e9 d\u2019un contrat de transport. Le transporteur a livr\u00e9 la marchandise avec un retard...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":806563,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-1-juillet-1993-n93-1166\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":2},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 1 juillet 1993, n\u00b093-1166","author":"Kohen","date":"01.05.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision le 1er juillet 1993 dans le contentieux \u00e9lectoral de la premi\u00e8re circonscription de la C\u00f4te-d'Or. Une...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":807266,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-17-juin-1986-n86-997\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":3},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 17 juin 1986, n\u00b086-997","author":"Kohen","date":"01.05.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel a rendu une d\u00e9cision le 17 juin 1986 relative \u00e0 la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 d\u2019une candidature \u00e9lectorale. Un candidat t\u00eate de liste dans...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-SjE4Eirl2ro-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":807280,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-1-avril-1986-n86-1000\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":4},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 1 avril 1986, n\u00b086-1000","author":"Kohen","date":"01.05.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 1er avril 1986, rejette la requ\u00eate d'un candidat contestant la r\u00e9partition des si\u00e8ges lors des \u00e9lections...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mahdi-samadzad-8wGLqHdkKbk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":807983,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/conseil-constitutionnel-le-7-novembre-1973-n73-712\/","url_meta":{"origin":1231140,"position":5},"title":"Conseil constitutionnel, le 7 novembre 1973, n\u00b073-712","author":"Kohen","date":"01.05.2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil constitutionnel, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 7 novembre 1973, a statu\u00e9 sur la contestation d'une \u00e9lection l\u00e9gislative dans la vingt-septi\u00e8me...","rel":"","context":"\u0412 &quot;Conseil constitutionnel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Conseil constitutionnel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence-constitutionnelle\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1231140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1231140"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1231140\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1231312,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1231140\/revisions\/1231312"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1231140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1231140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1231140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}