{"id":798179,"date":"2026-05-01T06:14:56","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:14:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T06:14:56","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:14:56","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ADEODATO BROTAS. Sum?rio (art? 663? n? 7 do CPC): 1- Atento o princ?pio da boa f?, n?o se pode equiparar o comprador que desconhece o defeito, ?quele que est? consciente da situa??o ou que dela n?o sabe por neglig?ncia sua. 2-A refer?ncia feita no art? 905? ao erro, deve ser interpretada no sentido de s? ser relevante o v?cio desconhecido. 3-O defeito oculto ? aquele que, sendo desconhecido do credor, pode ser legitimamente ignorado, pois n?o era detect?vel atrav?s de um exame diligente. 4- Exame diligente n?o ? sin?nimo de exame exaustivo ou rigoroso. 5-A dilig?ncia do comprador na detec??o do defeito ? determinada pela regra do bonus pater familias, atentas as circunst?ncias do caso; isto ?, o crit?rio objectivo deve ter em conta as circunst?ncias concretas, em particular a aptid?o do concreto comprador: a capacidade de exame da coisa de um comprador profissional, de certo ramo, ? superior ? dilig?ncia exigida a um leigo.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ADEODATO BROTAS. Sum?rio (art? 663? n? 7 do CPC): 1- Atento o princ?pio da boa f?, n?o se pode equiparar o comprador que desconhece o defeito, ?quele que est? consciente da situa??o ou que dela n?o sabe por neglig?ncia sua. 2-A refer?ncia feita no art? 905? ao erro, deve ser interpretada no sentido de s? ser relevante o v?cio desconhecido. 3-O defeito oculto ? aquele que, sendo desconhecido do credor, pode ser legitimamente ignorado, pois n?o era detect?vel atrav?s de um exame diligente. 4- Exame diligente n?o ? sin?nimo de exame exaustivo ou rigoroso. 5-A dilig?ncia do comprador na detec??o do defeito ? determinada pela regra do bonus pater familias, atentas as circunst?ncias do caso; isto ?, o crit?rio objectivo deve ter em conta as circunst?ncias concretas, em particular a aptid?o do concreto comprador: a capacidade de exame da coisa de um comprador profissional, de certo ramo, ? superior ? dilig?ncia exigida a um leigo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-798179","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ADEODATO BROTAS. Sum?rio (art? 663? n? 7 do CPC): 1- Atento o princ?pio da boa f?, n?o se pode equiparar o comprador que desconhece o defeito, ?quele que est? consciente da situa??o ou que dela n?o sabe por neglig?ncia sua. 2-A refer?ncia feita no art? 905? ao erro, deve ser interpretada no sentido de s? ser relevante o v?cio desconhecido. 3-O defeito oculto ? aquele que, sendo desconhecido do credor, pode ser legitimamente ignorado, pois n?o era detect?vel atrav?s de um exame diligente. 4- Exame diligente n?o ? sin?nimo de exame exaustivo ou rigoroso. 5-A dilig?ncia do comprador na detec??o do defeito ? determinada pela regra do bonus pater familias, atentas as circunst?ncias do caso; isto ?, o crit?rio objectivo deve ter em conta as circunst?ncias concretas, em particular a aptid?o do concreto comprador: a capacidade de exame da coisa de um comprador profissional, de certo ramo, ? superior ? dilig?ncia exigida a um leigo.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\\\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T04:14:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\\\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16","og_description":"Relator: ADEODATO BROTAS. Sum?rio (art? 663? n? 7 do CPC): 1- Atento o princ?pio da boa f?, n?o se pode equiparar o comprador que desconhece o defeito, ?quele que est? consciente da situa??o ou que dela n?o sabe por neglig?ncia sua. 2-A refer?ncia feita no art? 905? ao erro, deve ser interpretada no sentido de s? ser relevante o v?cio desconhecido. 3-O defeito oculto ? aquele que, sendo desconhecido do credor, pode ser legitimamente ignorado, pois n?o era detect?vel atrav?s de um exame diligente. 4- Exame diligente n?o ? sin?nimo de exame exaustivo ou rigoroso. 5-A dilig?ncia do comprador na detec??o do defeito ? determinada pela regra do bonus pater familias, atentas as circunst?ncias do caso; isto ?, o crit?rio objectivo deve ter em conta as circunst?ncias concretas, em particular a aptid?o do concreto comprador: a capacidade de exame da coisa de um comprador profissional, de certo ramo, ? superior ? dilig?ncia exigida a um leigo.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"1 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T04:14:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-7465-21-5t8lsb-l1-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 7465\/21.5T8LSB.L1-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/798179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=798179"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=798179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}