{"id":1228781,"date":"2026-07-01T23:55:18","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:55:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T23:55:18","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:55:18","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-du-caractere-obligatoire-des-cotisations-et-des-majorations-de-re\">I. L&#8217;affirmation du caract\u00e8re obligatoire des cotisations et des majorations de retard<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-principe-de-lobligation-legale-et-reglementaire-de-cotiser-pour-les-entrepr\">A. Le principe de l&#8217;obligation l\u00e9gale et r\u00e9glementaire de cotiser pour les entreprises du BTP<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-nature-reglementaire-des-majorations-de-retard-les-soustrayant-a-la-qualifi\">B. La nature r\u00e9glementaire des majorations de retard les soustrayant \u00e0 la qualification de clause p\u00e9nale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-limites-du-pouvoir-du-juge-dans-le-controle-des-accessoires-de-la-creance\">II. Les limites du pouvoir du juge dans le contr\u00f4le des accessoires de la cr\u00e9ance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-ladmission-conditionnee-des-majorations-de-retard-a-leur-justification\">A. L&#8217;admission conditionn\u00e9e des majorations de retard \u00e0 leur justification<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-des-frais-de-contentieux-comme-manifestation-du-controle-juridictionn\">B. Le rejet des frais de contentieux comme manifestation du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier ressort dans un litige opposant une association de cong\u00e9s intemp\u00e9ries du B\u00e2timent et des Travaux Publics \u00e0 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de construction. L&#8217;association demanderesse poursuivait le recouvrement de cotisations dues pour les mois de juin \u00e0 ao\u00fbt 2025, ainsi que des majorations de retard et des frais de contentieux pr\u00e9vus par son r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse, non comparante, n&#8217;a pas contest\u00e9 la dette.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 engag\u00e9e par assignation du 10 f\u00e9vrier 2026. L&#8217;association demanderesse sollicitait la condamnation de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 lui payer 1 449 euros au titre des cotisations principales, 40,48 euros de majorations de retard et 230 euros de frais de contentieux, outre une indemnit\u00e9 sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Elle invoquait les articles L. 3141-32 et D. 3141-12 et suivants du code du travail, ainsi que son r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur approuv\u00e9 par arr\u00eat\u00e9 minist\u00e9riel.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a fait droit \u00e0 la demande en principal et aux majorations de retard, mais a rejet\u00e9 la demande au titre des frais de contentieux. Il a condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 payer 1 449 euros de cotisations, 40,48 euros de majorations et 220 euros sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, tout en rappelant l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution provisoire de droit. La question juridique centrale est celle du pouvoir du juge de r\u00e9duire ou d&#8217;\u00e9carter les accessoires contractuels ou r\u00e9glementaires d&#8217;une cr\u00e9ance de cotisations sociales, lorsque ces accessoires sont pr\u00e9vus par le r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur d&#8217;une association agr\u00e9\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-du-caractere-obligatoire-des-cotisations-et-des-majorations-de-re\">I. L&#8217;affirmation du caract\u00e8re obligatoire des cotisations et des majorations de retard<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-principe-de-lobligation-legale-et-reglementaire-de-cotiser-pour-les-entrepr\">A. Le principe de l&#8217;obligation l\u00e9gale et r\u00e9glementaire de cotiser pour les entreprises du BTP<\/h3>\n<p>Les entreprises du secteur du b\u00e2timent et des travaux publics sont tenues, en application des articles L. 3141-32 et D. 3141-12 et suivants du code du travail, d&#8217;adh\u00e9rer \u00e0 une caisse de cong\u00e9s intemp\u00e9ries et de verser les cotisations correspondantes. Le tribunal rappelle ce fondement en visant express\u00e9ment ces textes dans les motifs de sa d\u00e9cision. Il constate que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse n&#8217;a pas r\u00e9gl\u00e9 les cotisations dues pour la p\u00e9riode de juin \u00e0 ao\u00fbt 2025, et que les justificatifs d&#8217;adh\u00e9sion et l&#8217;\u00e9tat des sommes dues sont produits. En l&#8217;absence de contestation, la cr\u00e9ance en principal est jug\u00e9e r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, recevable et bien fond\u00e9e. Cette solution est classique : le juge ne fait qu&#8217;appliquer le dispositif l\u00e9gal qui impose aux employeurs du BTP une obligation de cotisation, sans pouvoir moduler le principe de la dette. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 n&#8217;\u00e9tant pas comparante, le tribunal a pu statuer par d\u00e9faut et accorder la somme r\u00e9clam\u00e9e \u00e0 titre principal.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-nature-reglementaire-des-majorations-de-retard-les-soustrayant-a-la-qualifi\">B. La nature r\u00e9glementaire des majorations de retard les soustrayant \u00e0 la qualification de clause p\u00e9nale<\/h3>\n<p>Le r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur de l&#8217;association, agr\u00e9\u00e9 par arr\u00eat\u00e9 minist\u00e9riel, pr\u00e9voit en son article 6 des majorations de retard en cas de paiement tardif des cotisations. Le tribunal applique ces majorations sans les r\u00e9duire, alors m\u00eame qu&#8217;elles pourraient, dans un contrat ordinaire, \u00eatre assimil\u00e9es \u00e0 une clause p\u00e9nale susceptible d&#8217;\u00eatre mod\u00e9r\u00e9e par le juge en vertu de l&#8217;article 1231-5 du code civil. La jurisprudence r\u00e9cente distingue selon la source de la majoration. La Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;cette majoration ne peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une clause p\u00e9nale d\u00e8s lors qu&#8217;elle n&#8217;est pas simplement contractuelle mais r\u00e9sulte du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur de la caisse et ne peut donc \u00eatre r\u00e9duite par le juge&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c7eddafb880e5bf4317621\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, 4 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01851)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris a relev\u00e9 que les majorations et frais sont pr\u00e9vus par l&#8217;article 6 a et b du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur de l&#8217;association, <em>&#8220;agr\u00e9\u00e9 par arr\u00eat\u00e9 du minist\u00e8re du travail [&#8230;] et ayant ainsi un caract\u00e8re r\u00e9glementaire&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789f561b7cff8efb7357643\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b021\/18403)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal de Nanterre s&#8217;inscrit dans cette lign\u00e9e en accordant les majorations sans examen de leur proportionnalit\u00e9, reconnaissant implicitement leur nature r\u00e9glementaire.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-limites-du-pouvoir-du-juge-dans-le-controle-des-accessoires-de-la-creance\">II. Les limites du pouvoir du juge dans le contr\u00f4le des accessoires de la cr\u00e9ance<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-ladmission-conditionnee-des-majorations-de-retard-a-leur-justification\">A. L&#8217;admission conditionn\u00e9e des majorations de retard \u00e0 leur justification<\/h3>\n<p>Si le tribunal admet le principe des majorations de retard, il ne le fait pas sans condition. L&#8217;association demanderesse sollicitait 40,48 euros \u00e0 ce titre, somme que le tribunal accorde. Cependant, la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, dans la m\u00eame d\u00e9cision pr\u00e9cit\u00e9e, avait refus\u00e9 d&#8217;inclure les majorations dans la provision allou\u00e9e au motif que <em>&#8220;les diff\u00e9rents d\u00e9comptes produits [&#8230;] ne permettent pas de comprendre et donc de v\u00e9rifier le calcul des majorations passant de 9323,37 euros \u00e0 12056,06 euros en moins de cinq mois. Il existe en cela une contestation s\u00e9rieuse justifiant de ne pas inclure leur montant dans la provision&#8221;<\/em> (CA Amiens, 4 mars 2025). En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a pu v\u00e9rifier le calcul des majorations \u00e0 partir des pi\u00e8ces produites, notamment l&#8217;\u00e9tat des sommes dues et la mise en demeure. Il n&#8217;a relev\u00e9 aucune contestation s\u00e9rieuse, ce qui explique qu&#8217;il ait accord\u00e9 la somme demand\u00e9e. La solution d\u00e9pend donc de la qualit\u00e9 et de la clart\u00e9 des justificatifs fournis par l&#8217;association.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-des-frais-de-contentieux-comme-manifestation-du-controle-juridictionn\">B. Le rejet des frais de contentieux comme manifestation du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article 6 du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur pr\u00e9voit \u00e9galement des frais de contentieux. L&#8217;association demanderesse en r\u00e9clamait 230 euros. Le tribunal l&#8217;en a d\u00e9bout\u00e9e, sans autre motif que <em>&#8220;rejeter la demande au titre des frais de contentieux&#8221;<\/em>. Ce rejet peut s&#8217;expliquer par plusieurs consid\u00e9rations. D&#8217;une part, ces frais ne sont pas directement li\u00e9s \u00e0 la cr\u00e9ance principale et peuvent \u00eatre regard\u00e9s comme une p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 compl\u00e9mentaire. D&#8217;autre part, le juge conserve un pouvoir d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation sur leur bien-fond\u00e9, m\u00eame s&#8217;ils sont pr\u00e9vus par un r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur \u00e0 caract\u00e8re r\u00e9glementaire. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris avait inclus dans la condamnation <em>&#8220;des majorations sur \u00e9ch\u00e9ances non r\u00e9gl\u00e9es et des frais de proc\u00e9dure (ceux-ci pr\u00e9vus par l&#8217;article 6 a et b du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur)&#8221;<\/em> (CA Paris, 16 janvier 2025), mais uniquement sur justification. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a estim\u00e9 que les frais de contentieux n&#8217;\u00e9taient pas justifi\u00e9s ou que leur montant \u00e9tait excessif, exer\u00e7ant ainsi un contr\u00f4le r\u00e9siduel. Cette position est coh\u00e9rente avec la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de ne pas laisser un organisme professionnel fixer arbitrairement des p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s sans aucune limite judiciaire. Le tribunal concilie ainsi la force obligatoire du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur avec les pr\u00e9rogatives du juge du fond.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c7eddafb880e5bf4317621\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Amiens, le 4 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01851<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6789f561b7cff8efb7357643\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b021\/18403<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032010131\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1231-5 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Lorsque le contrat stipule que celui qui manquera de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter paiera une certaine somme \u00e0 titre de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats, il ne peut \u00eatre allou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;autre partie une somme plus forte ni moindre.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00e9anmoins, le juge peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, mod\u00e9rer ou augmenter la p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 ainsi convenue si elle est manifestement excessive ou d\u00e9risoire.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque l&#8217;engagement a \u00e9t\u00e9 ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 en partie, la p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 convenue peut \u00eatre diminu\u00e9e par le juge, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, \u00e0 proportion de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat que l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution partielle a procur\u00e9 au cr\u00e9ancier, sans pr\u00e9judice de l&#8217;application de l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent.<\/p>\n<p>Toute stipulation contraire aux deux alin\u00e9as pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents est r\u00e9put\u00e9e non \u00e9crite.<\/p>\n<p>Sauf inex\u00e9cution d\u00e9finitive, la p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 n&#8217;est encourue que lorsque le d\u00e9biteur est mis en demeure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4917,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f0e4fdcdc6046d47dc0c4c","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f0e4fdcdc6046d47dc0c4c","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f0e4fdcdc6046d47dc0c4c","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"4\u00e8me chambre","_kj_rg":"2026F00535","_kj_date":"2026-04-09","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1690,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6000,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535","og_description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6000,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"Kohen","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"8 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/"},"wordCount":1690,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:55:18+00:00","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (4\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026F00535) a rendu un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire et en dernier...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","width":6000,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00535\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00535"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nathan-cima-chaLsSBHLAs-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59F3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1228790,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00527\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00527","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 9 avril 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d'une demande en paiement form\u00e9e par une caisse de cong\u00e9s...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/dillon-t-lHQ7gU7SgdM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228792,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00519\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00519","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a rendu le 9 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02026F00519) relatif au recouvrement de cotisations dues \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-sMJ3mY9amdU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228786,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00524\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00524","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans un jugement rendu le 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00524), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une caisse de cong\u00e9s intemp\u00e9ries...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-O3uK7nvrxdI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228772,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00528\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00528","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00528), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une association de gestion des cong\u00e9s...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-Fv_rvhKNXN0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228785,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228780,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00525\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228781,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00525","author":"Kohen","date":"1 Temmuz 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans sa quatri\u00e8me chambre, a rendu le 9 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02026F00525) statuant sur une demande...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228781\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}