{"id":1228785,"date":"2026-07-01T23:55:44","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:55:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T23:55:44","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:55:44","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-de-la-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-dadhesion-a-la-caisse\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la force obligatoire du contrat d&#8217;adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la caisse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-fondement-de-lobligation-de-paiement-des-cotisations-et-des-penalites\">A. Le fondement de l&#8217;obligation de paiement des cotisations et des p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-limite-du-pouvoir-du-juge-face-aux-stipulations-du-reglement-interieur\">B. La limite du pouvoir du juge face aux stipulations du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-loffice-du-juge-dans-la-mise-en-uvre-des-mesures-coercitives-et-indemnitaires\">II. L&#8217;office du juge dans la mise en \u0153uvre des mesures coercitives et indemnitaires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lastreinte-provisoire-comme-instrument-de-contrainte-legitime\">A. L&#8217;astreinte provisoire comme instrument de contrainte l\u00e9gitime<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-reparation-du-prejudice-procedural-par-larticle-700-du-code-de-procedure-ci\">B. La r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice proc\u00e9dural par l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une association gestionnaire de la caisse de cong\u00e9s intemp\u00e9ries du B\u00e2timent et des Travaux publics \u00e0 une entreprise adh\u00e9rente de ce secteur.<\/p>\n<p>Le demandeur, organisme paritaire, a assign\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse en paiement de cotisations impay\u00e9es pour la p\u00e9riode de mars \u00e0 septembre 2025, de cotisations provisionnelles pour octobre 2025, ainsi que des majorations de retard et frais de contentieux. Il sollicitait \u00e9galement la remise des d\u00e9clarations de salaires manquantes sous astreinte. La d\u00e9fenderesse, non comparante, n&#8217;a pas contest\u00e9 les demandes.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale est celle de l&#8217;\u00e9tendue de l&#8217;obligation contractuelle d&#8217;un adh\u00e9rent d&#8217;une caisse de cong\u00e9s intemp\u00e9ries BTP : cette obligation inclut-elle le paiement des cotisations provisionnelles et la remise des d\u00e9clarations sous astreinte, et le juge peut-il \u00e9carter les frais de contentieux stipul\u00e9s au r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur ?<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9e contradictoire en premier ressort, a condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse au paiement des cotisations exigibles et provisionnelles, ordonn\u00e9 la remise des d\u00e9clarations sous astreinte provisoire, rejet\u00e9 la demande de frais de contentieux, et accord\u00e9 une somme au titre de l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-de-la-force-obligatoire-du-contrat-dadhesion-a-la-caisse\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la force obligatoire du contrat d&#8217;adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la caisse<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-fondement-de-lobligation-de-paiement-des-cotisations-et-des-penalites\">A. Le fondement de l&#8217;obligation de paiement des cotisations et des p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a accueilli la demande en principal en relevant que celle-ci \u00e9tait r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, recevable et bien fond\u00e9e, en s&#8217;appuyant sur les pi\u00e8ces produites, notamment les justificatifs d&#8217;adh\u00e9sion et l&#8217;\u00e9tat des sommes dues. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans la logique contractuelle de l&#8217;adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la caisse. L&#8217;entreprise adh\u00e9rente, en signant les statuts et le r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur, s&#8217;engage \u00e0 respecter l&#8217;ensemble des obligations qui en d\u00e9coulent. Comme l&#8217;a rappel\u00e9 la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens dans un arr\u00eat du 4 mars 2025, <em>&#8220;la SAS LM B\u00e2timent en adh\u00e9rant \u00e0 la CIBTP NO s&#8217;est engag\u00e9e \u00e0 se conformer aux statuts et au r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur de la caisse, agr\u00e9\u00e9s par le minist\u00e8re du travail de l&#8217;emploi de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social qui lui sont donc applicables&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c7eddafb880e5bf4317621\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, 4 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01851)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques applique donc ce principe : l&#8217;adh\u00e9sion cr\u00e9e une obligation contractuelle de payer les cotisations et majorations pr\u00e9vues.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-limite-du-pouvoir-du-juge-face-aux-stipulations-du-reglement-interieur\">B. La limite du pouvoir du juge face aux stipulations du r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 la demande au titre des frais de contentieux, sans autre justification. Cette solution peut \u00eatre discut\u00e9e. En principe, le r\u00e8glement int\u00e9rieur de la caisse constitue la loi des parties. La Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9, dans la m\u00eame affaire, que <em>&#8220;tout d\u00e9faut dans le paiement des cotisations dans les d\u00e9lais prescrits expose l&#8217;adh\u00e9rent d\u00e9faillant au paiement d&#8217;une majoration par mois de retard&#8221;<\/em> et que cette majoration <em>&#8220;courant \u00e0 compter de la date d&#8217;exigibilit\u00e9 des cotisations sans mise en demeure pr\u00e9alable&#8221;<\/em>. Si le tribunal admet les majorations de retard, il \u00e9carte les frais de contentieux pourtant pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;article 6 du m\u00eame r\u00e8glement. En ne motivant pas ce rejet, le jugement laisse planer un doute : soit il consid\u00e8re que ces frais constituent une clause p\u00e9nale excessive, soit il estime qu&#8217;ils ne sont pas justifi\u00e9s en l&#8217;absence de contestation. Cette position, bien que favorable au d\u00e9biteur, affaiblit la force normative du contrat d&#8217;adh\u00e9sion.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-loffice-du-juge-dans-la-mise-en-uvre-des-mesures-coercitives-et-indemnitaires\">II. L&#8217;office du juge dans la mise en \u0153uvre des mesures coercitives et indemnitaires<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lastreinte-provisoire-comme-instrument-de-contrainte-legitime\">A. L&#8217;astreinte provisoire comme instrument de contrainte l\u00e9gitime<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a ordonn\u00e9 la remise des d\u00e9clarations de salaires manquantes sous astreinte provisoire de seize euros par jour de retard pendant un mois, et s&#8217;est r\u00e9serv\u00e9 la liquidation. Cette astreinte vise \u00e0 contraindre l&#8217;entreprise \u00e0 ex\u00e9cuter une obligation accessoire au paiement des cotisations : la production des d\u00e9clarations permet \u00e0 la caisse de v\u00e9rifier le montant exact des sommes dues. Le juge reste prudent en qualifiant l&#8217;astreinte de provisoire et en limitant sa dur\u00e9e, ce qui respecte la proportionnalit\u00e9 de la mesure. Il rappelle ainsi que l&#8217;astreinte n&#8217;est pas une peine, mais un moyen de pression pour obtenir l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une obligation. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence selon laquelle le juge ne peut modifier le dispositif du titre ex\u00e9cutoire <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679c70eb511a76d706a46863\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, 30 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/04950)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal n&#8217;outrepasse pas ses pouvoirs puisqu&#8217;il se borne \u00e0 ordonner une mesure accessoire \u00e0 la condamnation principale.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-reparation-du-prejudice-procedural-par-larticle-700-du-code-de-procedure-ci\">B. La r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice proc\u00e9dural par l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a condamn\u00e9 la d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e0 payer 220 euros au titre de l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il fonde cette indemnit\u00e9 sur le fait que la d\u00e9fenderesse a oblig\u00e9 le demandeur \u00e0 exposer des frais pour une dette non s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Cette motivation est conforme \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 et \u00e0 la finalit\u00e9 de l&#8217;article 700, qui vise \u00e0 indemniser la partie qui a d\u00fb agir en justice pour faire reconna\u00eetre ses droits. Le montant allou\u00e9, mod\u00e9r\u00e9, correspond \u00e0 une juste appr\u00e9ciation des frais engag\u00e9s. Le tribunal liquide \u00e9galement les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 recouvrer par le greffe pour un montant de 55,69 euros. Cette solution, bien que classique, souligne l&#8217;importance de l&#8217;incitation \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution spontan\u00e9e des obligations contractuelles, sous peine de supporter les frais de la contrainte judiciaire.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679c70eb511a76d706a46863\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 30 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/04950<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c7eddafb880e5bf4317621\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Amiens, le 4 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/01851<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9492,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f0e494cdc6046d47dbf53b","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f0e494cdc6046d47dbf53b","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f0e494cdc6046d47dbf53b","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"4\u00e8me chambre","_kj_rg":"2026F00533","_kj_date":"2026-04-09","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1305,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2200,\"height\":3500},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533","og_description":"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2200,"height":3500,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"Kohen","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"6 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/"},"wordCount":1305,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:55:44+00:00","description":"La pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision \u00e9mane du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, 4\u00e8me chambre, en date du 9 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026F00533). Le litige oppose une...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","width":2200,"height":3500},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026f00533\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00533"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-3eXgkMpE-pQ-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59F7","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":494446,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00819\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00819","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 octobre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de provision. La requ\u00e9rante,...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494534,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-28-octobre-2025-n2025r01008\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R01008","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 28 octobre 2025, examine une demande en r\u00e9tractation. Des travailleurs...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494442,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00887\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00887","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 27 octobre 2025, statue sur une demande de provision. Une pharmacie demande...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494764,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00725\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00725","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 27 octobre 2025. Le mandataire liquidateur d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":489930,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-20-novembre-2025-n24-00046\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 20 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00046","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 20 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une exception d'incomp\u00e9tence territoriale. Le litige oppose un...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491852,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-17-novembre-2025-n22-00974\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228785,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/00974","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans un jugement du 10 juillet 2024, statue sur une demande en inopposabilit\u00e9 d'une d\u00e9cision de prise en charge d'une...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}