{"id":1228923,"date":"2026-07-02T00:22:31","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T22:22:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T00:22:31","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T22:22:31","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-dun-controle-juridictionnel-limite-mais-effectif-de-la-mesure-dis\">I. L&#8217;affirmation d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel limit\u00e9 mais effectif de la mesure d&#8217;isolement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-les-criteres-legaux-de-la-mesure-et-loffice-du-juge\">A. Les crit\u00e8res l\u00e9gaux de la mesure et l&#8217;office du juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-verification-de-la-regularite-procedurale-et-la-motivation-des-decisions-me\">B. La v\u00e9rification de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale et la motivation des d\u00e9cisions m\u00e9dicales<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-consecration-dune-conciliation-entre-protection-des-droits-fondamentaux-et\">II. La cons\u00e9cration d&#8217;une conciliation entre protection des droits fondamentaux et imp\u00e9ratifs th\u00e9rapeutiques<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-protection-du-patient-contre-larbitraire-par-le-controle-des-motifs\">A. La protection du patient contre l&#8217;arbitraire par le contr\u00f4le des motifs<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-limites-du-controle-juridictionnel-face-a-lappreciation-medicale\">B. Les limites du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel face \u00e0 l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation m\u00e9dicale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139) relative au maintien d&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;isolement concernant un patient hospitalis\u00e9 sans consentement. Le 26 mars 2026 \u00e0 13h10, un psychiatre avait pris une d\u00e9cision d&#8217;isolement motiv\u00e9e par un risque de passage \u00e0 l&#8217;acte h\u00e9t\u00e9ro-agressif, mesure renouvel\u00e9e \u00e0 plusieurs reprises. Le 29 mars 2026 \u00e0 11h13, un nouveau renouvellement a \u00e9t\u00e9 prescrit, conduisant le directeur de l&#8217;\u00e9tablissement \u00e0 saisir le juge afin d&#8217;obtenir l&#8217;autorisation de maintien de la mesure au-del\u00e0 de la soixante-douzi\u00e8me heure d&#8217;isolement. Le juge devait d\u00e9terminer si les conditions l\u00e9gales de l&#8217;article L3222-5-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique \u00e9taient respect\u00e9es et s&#8217;il pouvait contr\u00f4ler le bien-fond\u00e9 m\u00e9dical de la d\u00e9cision. La question de droit portait sur l&#8217;\u00e9tendue du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel des mesures d&#8217;isolement : le juge peut-il substituer son appr\u00e9ciation \u00e0 celle du psychiatre sur l&#8217;opportunit\u00e9 th\u00e9rapeutique de la mesure ? La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e a autoris\u00e9 le maintien de la mesure d&#8217;isolement, estimant que la proc\u00e9dure \u00e9tait r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et que le renouvellement \u00e9tait valablement motiv\u00e9 au regard des crit\u00e8res l\u00e9gaux.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-dun-controle-juridictionnel-limite-mais-effectif-de-la-mesure-dis\">I. L&#8217;affirmation d&#8217;un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel limit\u00e9 mais effectif de la mesure d&#8217;isolement<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-les-criteres-legaux-de-la-mesure-et-loffice-du-juge\">A. Les crit\u00e8res l\u00e9gaux de la mesure et l&#8217;office du juge<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article L3222-5-1 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique \u00e9nonce que l&#8217;isolement constitue une pratique de dernier recours, r\u00e9serv\u00e9e aux patients en hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sans consentement. Trois conditions cumulatives sont exig\u00e9es : pr\u00e9venir un dommage imm\u00e9diat ou imminent, une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e d&#8217;un psychiatre, et un caract\u00e8re adapt\u00e9, n\u00e9cessaire et proportionn\u00e9 au risque apr\u00e8s \u00e9valuation du patient. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e rappelle que <em>&#8220;le juge ne peut se substituer \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale s\u2019agissant de l\u2019\u00e9valuation du consentement du patient, du diagnostic pos\u00e9 ou des soins&#8221;<\/em>. Cette affirmation liminaire circonscrit strictement l&#8217;office du juge : il n&#8217;op\u00e8re pas un contr\u00f4le d&#8217;opportunit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale, mais un contr\u00f4le de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 externe et interne de la mesure. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge v\u00e9rifie que la mesure a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise <em>&#8220;par une d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e du Dr, [G], psychiatre, le 26 mars 2026 \u00e0 13h10&#8221;<\/em> et que les crit\u00e8res de n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 et de proportionnalit\u00e9 sont remplis. Il rel\u00e8ve ainsi l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un risque de passage \u00e0 l&#8217;acte h\u00e9t\u00e9ro-agressif, ce qui caract\u00e9rise un dommage imminent pour autrui. Le juge ne se prononce pas sur la pertinence du diagnostic, mais sur la pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs de dangerosit\u00e9 imm\u00e9diate. Cette d\u00e9marche est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence qui exige que le m\u00e9decin ait <em>&#8220;parfaitement caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 le risque de dommage imm\u00e9diat ou imminent pour le patient ou pour autrui, que seule une mesure d&#8217;isolement permettait d&#8217;\u00e9viter&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f750a36527a11effc4b641\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles, 9 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/02238)<\/a><\/strong>. Le contr\u00f4le juridictionnel porte donc sur l&#8217;existence et la motivation du risque, non sur son \u00e9valuation m\u00e9dicale approfondie.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-verification-de-la-regularite-procedurale-et-la-motivation-des-decisions-me\">B. La v\u00e9rification de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale et la motivation des d\u00e9cisions m\u00e9dicales<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge examine \u00e9galement la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure de renouvellement. La d\u00e9cision constate que la mesure initiale a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise <em>&#8220;pour une dur\u00e9e maximale de 12 heures&#8221;<\/em> et renouvel\u00e9e <em>&#8220;pour des p\u00e9riodes maximales d&#8217;environ 12 heures dans les m\u00eames conditions et selon les m\u00eames modalit\u00e9s par d\u00e9cisions motiv\u00e9es des \u00e9quipes m\u00e9dicales&#8221;<\/em>. Cette v\u00e9rification chronologique est essentielle : le non-respect des dur\u00e9es maximales ou l&#8217;absence de motivation \u00e0 chaque renouvellement entra\u00eenerait l&#8217;ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 de la mesure. Le juge s&#8217;assure aussi que le renouvellement du 29 mars 2026 \u00e0 11h13 est motiv\u00e9 par <em>&#8220;une d\u00e9sorganisation psychique et une adh\u00e9sion totale au d\u00e9lire&#8221;<\/em>, ce qui justifie la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de pr\u00e9venir un dommage imm\u00e9diat ou imminent. La motivation m\u00e9dicale est donc contr\u00f4l\u00e9e dans son contenu, m\u00eame si le juge ne la discute pas sur le fond. Par ailleurs, la d\u00e9cision mentionne que <em>&#8220;la proc\u00e9dure est r\u00e9guli\u00e8re&#8221;<\/em> sans d\u00e9tailler l&#8217;information des tiers ou la saisine du juge, mais le respect de ces formalit\u00e9s est implicitement valid\u00e9. La jurisprudence pr\u00e9cise que <em>&#8220;la mention du refus d&#8217;informer un proche figurant sur le document pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 cet effet suffit \u00e0 \u00e9tablir que la formalit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67dbb081d51dc83611ca892a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, 19 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00182)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, l&#8217;absence de contestation sur ce point permet de pr\u00e9sumer la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9. Le juge exerce donc un contr\u00f4le effectif des conditions de fond et de forme de la mesure, sans empi\u00e9ter sur le pouvoir m\u00e9dical.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-consecration-dune-conciliation-entre-protection-des-droits-fondamentaux-et\">II. La cons\u00e9cration d&#8217;une conciliation entre protection des droits fondamentaux et imp\u00e9ratifs th\u00e9rapeutiques<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-protection-du-patient-contre-larbitraire-par-le-controle-des-motifs\">A. La protection du patient contre l&#8217;arbitraire par le contr\u00f4le des motifs<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e participe \u00e0 la protection des droits fondamentaux des personnes hospitalis\u00e9es sans consentement. En exigeant une motivation individualis\u00e9e de chaque renouvellement, le juge emp\u00eache que l&#8217;isolement devienne une mesure automatique. Il rel\u00e8ve que la d\u00e9cision de renouvellement <em>&#8220;d\u00e9crit l\u2019existence de troubles mentaux rendant n\u00e9cessaire ce maintien&#8221;<\/em> et pr\u00e9cise les \u00e9l\u00e9ments cliniques qui fondent le risque. Cette exigence de motivation concr\u00e8te permet d&#8217;\u00e9viter l&#8217;arbitraire et garantit que la privation de libert\u00e9 reste strictement proportionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tat du patient. Le juge ne se contente pas d&#8217;une formule g\u00e9n\u00e9rique : il v\u00e9rifie que la dangerosit\u00e9 est actuelle et que les crit\u00e8res de l&#8217;article L3222-5-1 sont satisfaits \u00e0 chaque \u00e9tape. Ce contr\u00f4le juridictionnel est d&#8217;autant plus important que la mesure d&#8217;isolement constitue une atteinte grave \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 individuelle et \u00e0 la dignit\u00e9 du patient. La d\u00e9cision s&#8217;inscrit ainsi dans une logique de garantie des droits, conforme \u00e0 l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;un recours effectif devant une juridiction. Le juge joue un r\u00f4le de gardien des libert\u00e9s, m\u00eame dans un contexte m\u00e9dical o\u00f9 la priorit\u00e9 est la protection du patient et d&#8217;autrui.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-limites-du-controle-juridictionnel-face-a-lappreciation-medicale\">B. Les limites du contr\u00f4le juridictionnel face \u00e0 l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation m\u00e9dicale<\/h3>\n<p>Malgr\u00e9 ce contr\u00f4le effectif, la d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e illustre les limites inh\u00e9rentes \u00e0 l&#8217;office du juge. Celui-ci affirme express\u00e9ment ne pas pouvoir <em>&#8220;se substituer \u00e0 l\u2019autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale&#8221;<\/em>, ce qui signifie que l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation du risque rel\u00e8ve en dernier ressort du psychiatre. Le juge ne peut donc remettre en cause le diagnostic ou la strat\u00e9gie th\u00e9rapeutique, m\u00eame s&#8217;il peut constater une absence de motivation ou une disproportion manifeste. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge se borne \u00e0 constater que les motifs m\u00e9dicaux existent et sont suffisants, sans les discuter. Cette retenue judiciaire est compr\u00e9hensible au regard de la technicit\u00e9 des questions psychiatriques, mais elle laisse une marge d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation importante au corps m\u00e9dical. La fronti\u00e8re entre contr\u00f4le de l\u00e9galit\u00e9 et contr\u00f4le d&#8217;opportunit\u00e9 reste fragile : une motivation apparemment convaincante peut masquer une mesure injustifi\u00e9e. Par ailleurs, la d\u00e9cision ne mentionne pas si le patient a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu ou assist\u00e9 d&#8217;un avocat, ce qui interroge sur le respect du contradictoire. La jurisprudence admet que <em>&#8220;le bordereau d&#8217;envoi de la saisine pr\u00e9cise que les personnes mentionn\u00e9es \u00e0 l&#8217;article L3211-12 du code de la sant\u00e9 publique et identifi\u00e9es ont \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9es&#8221;<\/em> suffit \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la formalit\u00e9 <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67dbb081d51dc83611ca892a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, 19 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00182)<\/a><\/strong>, mais cette approche pourrait \u00eatre critiqu\u00e9e pour son formalisme. La conciliation entre protection des droits et imp\u00e9ratifs th\u00e9rapeutiques reste donc perfectible, le juge ne pouvant aller au-del\u00e0 de ce que le l\u00e9gislateur lui permet.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f750a36527a11effc4b641\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 9 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/02238<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67dbb081d51dc83611ca892a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 19 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00182<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9630,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac6b2cdc6046d478b41fe","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac6b2cdc6046d478b41fe","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac6b2cdc6046d478b41fe","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Lyon","_kj_chambre":"J.L.D.","_kj_rg":"26\/01139","_kj_date":"2026-03-29","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5891\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3321\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01139\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1476,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01139\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01139 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\\\/01139)...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5891,\"height\":3321},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01139\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139","og_description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5891,"height":3321,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"Kohen","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"7 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139","datePublished":"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/"},"wordCount":1476,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T22:22:31+00:00","description":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en la personne du juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01139)...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","width":5891,"height":3321},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01139\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01139"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-2t1i0nXa-BI-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59Hl","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":494432,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-octobre-2025-n20-00773\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 octobre 2025, n\u00b020\/00773","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le p\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, par jugement du 29 octobre 2025, statue sur une action en r\u00e9p\u00e9tition d'indu. Un organisme d'assurance...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499881,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-26-novembre-2025-n25-01211\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01211","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 26 novembre 2025. Cette d\u00e9cision intervient dans un litige opposant un...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-uIEL3NE30xk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498596,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-27-novembre-2025-n25-04532\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/04532","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-libert\u00e9 le 26 novembre 2025, examine une requ\u00eate en prolongation de r\u00e9tention administrative....","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stephanie-leblanc-53aGntxJ8iA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":499503,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-26-novembre-2025-n25-00855\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 26 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00855","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, statuant par ordonnance en date du 14 novembre 2025, examine une demande en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-r\u00e9tractation. Cette demande vise une...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498688,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-27-novembre-2025-n25-01530\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01530","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 15 janvier 2026. Le bailleur demandait l\u2019expulsion de locataires pour impay\u00e9s de...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491972,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dantibes-le-14-novembre-2025-n2024j02261\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228923,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de commerce d&#8217;Antibes, le 14 novembre 2025, n\u00b02024J02261","author":"Kohen","date":"8 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de premi\u00e8re instance, statuant par une d\u00e9cision du 7 novembre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une instance civile. Apr\u00e8s plusieurs reports, les...","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/manuela-martinez-G7KXRXyFDwQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228923"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228923\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}