{"id":684509,"date":"2026-04-25T19:43:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T17:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T19:43:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T17:43:00","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"article-content\">\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La demanderesse, active dans la transaction immobili\u00e8re, impute \u00e0 un ancien mandataire des actes de d\u00e9bauchage constitutifs de concurrence d\u00e9loyale apr\u00e8s la rupture de leur collaboration. Elle sollicite une cessation des pratiques all\u00e9gu\u00e9es, des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats cons\u00e9quents, ainsi que des mesures d\u2019ex\u00e9cution assorties d\u2019astreinte. Le d\u00e9fendeur forme un incident pour obtenir un sursis, invoquant des proc\u00e9dures parall\u00e8les relatives \u00e0 des situations proches, et sollicite subsidiairement un dessaisissement pour connexit\u00e9. Il r\u00e9clame en outre des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour abus de proc\u00e9dure, une indemnit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale, et la prise en charge des d\u00e9pens de l\u2019incident. Les pr\u00e9tentions incidentes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9battues \u00e0 l\u2019audience de mise en \u00e9tat du 28 avril 2025, apr\u00e8s \u00e9changes d\u2019\u00e9critures, puis mises en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la date indiqu\u00e9e. La question pos\u00e9e tient \u00e0 l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 d\u2019un sursis demand\u00e9 dans l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne administration de la justice et aux conditions du dessaisissement pour connexit\u00e9. Assez classiquement, se greffe l\u2019examen de l\u2019office du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat face \u00e0 une demande indemnitaire autonome. Elle cite: \u00ab Aux termes de l\u2019article 789 1\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge de la mise en \u00e9tat est, \u00e0 compter de sa d\u00e9signation et, jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 son dessaisissement, seul comp\u00e9tent, \u00e0 l&#8217;exclusion de toute autre formation du tribunal, pour statuer sur les exceptions de proc\u00e9dure, les demandes form\u00e9es en application de l&#8217;article 47 et les incidents mettant fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance \u00bb. Elle refuse en cons\u00e9quence le sursis, relevant l\u2019examen n\u00e9cessairement individualis\u00e9 des fautes et du pr\u00e9judice all\u00e9gu\u00e9. Sur la connexit\u00e9, elle rappelle que \u00ab Le dessaisissement ne peut \u00eatre demand\u00e9 sur ce fondement lorsque plus de deux juridictions sont saisies \u00bb et l\u2019\u00e9carte. Enfin, elle juge que \u00ab Cette demande indemnitaire ne rel\u00e8ve pas de la comp\u00e9tence du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat \u00bb et statue sur les frais.<\/p>\n<p>I. Le sursis \u00e0 statuer \u00e9cart\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>A. Cadre normatif et office du juge<\/p>\n<p>Le texte de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence est mobilis\u00e9 avec pr\u00e9cision. La d\u00e9cision rappelle d\u2019abord la comp\u00e9tence fonctionnelle: \u00ab Aux termes de l\u2019article 789 1\u00b0 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge de la mise en \u00e9tat est, \u00e0 compter de sa d\u00e9signation et, jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 son dessaisissement, seul comp\u00e9tent, \u00e0 l&#8217;exclusion de toute autre formation du tribunal, pour statuer sur les exceptions de proc\u00e9dure, les demandes form\u00e9es en application de l&#8217;article 47 et les incidents mettant fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance \u00bb. Cette affirmation place l\u2019incident dans le p\u00e9rim\u00e8tre exclusif du magistrat en charge de l\u2019instruction, sans perturber le fond.<\/p>\n<p>Le r\u00e9gime du sursis est ensuite rappel\u00e9 dans sa nature et sa finalit\u00e9. La juridiction cite le texte de l\u2019article 378, en soulignant ses effets: \u00ab Selon l\u2019article 378 du m\u00eame code, la d\u00e9cision de sursis suspend le cours de l&#8217;instance pour le temps ou jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 la survenance de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement qu&#8217;elle d\u00e9termine \u00bb. L\u2019outil proc\u00e9dural demeure exceptionnel, car attentatoire \u00e0 l\u2019exigence de c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9. Il est surtout discr\u00e9tionnaire lorsque fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne justice. La d\u00e9cision le formule sans ambigu\u00eft\u00e9: \u00ab Lorsque le sursis n\u2019est pas impos\u00e9 par la loi, mais sollicit\u00e9 dans l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne administration de la justice, le juge dispose d\u2019un pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation discr\u00e9tionnaire \u00bb. Le rappel normatif structure le contr\u00f4le: utilit\u00e9, n\u00e9cessit\u00e9, et proportion de la suspension au regard du litige instruit.<\/p>\n<p>B. Appr\u00e9ciation individualis\u00e9e des faits et pr\u00e9vention des doubles indemnisations<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019ordonnance refuse le sursis en raison de la singularit\u00e9 factuelle de chaque dossier. Elle souligne que \u00ab En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les fautes invoqu\u00e9es doivent \u00eatre examin\u00e9es factuellement pour chaque d\u00e9fendeur et les d\u00e9cisions rendues dans les autres dossiers n\u2019auront pas d\u2019incidence sur l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de la faute dans la pr\u00e9sente affaire \u00bb. Cette motivation privil\u00e9gie l\u2019examen concret des \u00e9l\u00e9ments produits, sans se lier \u00e0 des d\u00e9cisions parall\u00e8les potentiellement h\u00e9t\u00e9rog\u00e8nes.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction ajoute un garde-fou contre le cumul des r\u00e9parations, utile dans des contentieux en s\u00e9rie. Elle indique que \u00ab Il reviendra au demandeur de justifier du pr\u00e9judice sp\u00e9cifiquement caus\u00e9 selon lui par chaque d\u00e9fendeur dans chaque dossier, sans pouvoir formuler de double indemnisation du m\u00eame pr\u00e9judice, ce que les juges du fond appr\u00e9cieront \u00bb. La perspective ainsi fix\u00e9e est claire: individualiser la faute et le dommage, puis laisser le fond allouer, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, une r\u00e9paration non redondante. La conclusion s\u2019impose alors, nette dans sa formulation: \u00ab Il n\u2019est donc pas opportun d\u2019ordonner un sursis \u00e0 statuer \u00bb. La solution pr\u00e9sente un int\u00e9r\u00eat pratique marqu\u00e9, car elle \u00e9vite une paralysie g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e au profit d\u2019un contr\u00f4le cibl\u00e9 des risques de chevauchement indemnitaire.<\/p>\n<p>II. Connexit\u00e9 inop\u00e9rante et office limit\u00e9 du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat<\/p>\n<p>A. Multiplicit\u00e9 des saisines et impossibilit\u00e9 de dessaisissement<\/p>\n<p>Sur la connexit\u00e9, la juridiction se fonde sur l\u2019\u00e9conomie de l\u2019article 101, en rappelant son m\u00e9canisme: \u00ab Aux termes de l\u2019article 101 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, s&#8217;il existe entre des affaires port\u00e9es devant deux juridictions distinctes un lien tel qu&#8217;il soit de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat d&#8217;une bonne justice de les faire instruire et juger ensemble, il peut \u00eatre demand\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;une de ces juridictions de se dessaisir et de renvoyer en l&#8217;\u00e9tat la connaissance de l&#8217;affaire \u00e0 l&#8217;autre juridiction \u00bb. L\u2019objectif vis\u00e9 est une instruction commune lorsque deux juridictions sont concern\u00e9es par un m\u00eame ensemble litigieux.<\/p>\n<p>Le texte contient toutefois une limite d\u00e9cisive, directement opposable \u00e0 la demande. La juridiction cite express\u00e9ment que \u00ab Le dessaisissement ne peut \u00eatre demand\u00e9 sur ce fondement lorsque plus de deux juridictions sont saisies \u00bb. La pr\u00e9sence de multiples instances parall\u00e8les rend la connexit\u00e9 impropre \u00e0 op\u00e9rer un renvoi utile. La coh\u00e9rence du r\u00e9seau de proc\u00e9dures ne peut pas, dans ce cadre, se reconstituer par un basculement unique. Le rejet est donc conforme au texte et \u00e0 sa finalit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viter des renvois en cha\u00eene.<\/p>\n<p>B. Exclusion des demandes indemnitaires incidentes et r\u00e9gulation des frais<\/p>\n<p>Le juge de la mise en \u00e9tat recentre ensuite son office, au regard de la pr\u00e9tention indemnitaire pour abus de proc\u00e9dure. Il retient, en des termes d\u00e9pourvus d\u2019ambigu\u00eft\u00e9, que \u00ab Cette demande indemnitaire ne rel\u00e8ve pas de la comp\u00e9tence du juge de la mise en \u00e9tat telle que rappel\u00e9e notamment aux dispositions de l\u2019article 789 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00bb. Cette limite organique \u00e9vite l\u2019hybridation de l\u2019incident avec un contentieux de responsabilit\u00e9 autonome. Elle pr\u00e9serve l\u2019\u00e9quilibre du contradictoire et renvoie l\u2019\u00e9ventuel d\u00e9bat indemnitaire au juge du fond, seul \u00e0 m\u00eame d\u2019en appr\u00e9cier la substance.<\/p>\n<p>La r\u00e9gulation des frais s\u2019inscrit dans la gestion ordinaire de l\u2019incident. Les d\u00e9pens sont support\u00e9s par le d\u00e9fendeur, tandis que les pr\u00e9tentions adverses au titre de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale sont \u00e9cart\u00e9es pour des motifs d\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9. La solution demeure mesur\u00e9e, car elle articule le rappel des bornes de comp\u00e9tence avec une allocation pragmatique des charges. L\u2019\u00e9conomie g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de l\u2019ordonnance invite, plus largement, \u00e0 conduire ces contentieux en s\u00e9rie sans instrumentaliser le sursis ni le dessaisissement, tout en garantissant une stricte individualisation des fautes et des pr\u00e9judices. Cette approche, centr\u00e9e sur le fait et la proportion, limite les al\u00e9as de coordination interjuridictionnelle et s\u00e9curise la suite de l\u2019instruction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9496,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"68506f192208eb4aca7a12cd","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68506f192208eb4aca7a12cd","_kj_judilibre_id":"68506f192208eb4aca7a12cd","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Meaux","_kj_chambre":"1\u00e8re ch. - Sect. 3","_kj_rg":"24\/04410","_kj_date":"2025-06-16","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7597],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-684509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\\\/04410\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1334,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Jurisprudence\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\\\/04410\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Jurisprudence\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\\\/04410 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6500,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\\\/04410\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/tr\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6500,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"Kohen","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"7 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410","datePublished":"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/"},"wordCount":1334,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Jurisprudence"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Jurisprudence"}],"dateModified":"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-25T17:43:00+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 16 juin 2025, statue en incident de mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes de sursis et de dessaisissement. La dema...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","width":6500,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-04410\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/04410"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-7NmYG4-AE24-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-2S4t","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222610,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-03100\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/03100","author":"Kohen","date":"25 Aral\u0131k 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"L\u2019ordonnance rendue par le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, statue en mise en \u00e9tat sur des demandes incidentes de sursis \u00e0 statuer, de dessaisissement pour connexit\u00e9 et de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour abus de proc\u00e9dure. Le litige principal oppose un ancien mandataire \u00e0 son ex-r\u00e9seau au sujet d\u2019actes all\u00e9gu\u00e9s\u2026","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ph-m-nh-t-QLIDNQGghjM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238171,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-16-juin-2025-n24-03239\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 16 juin 2025, n\u00b024\/03239","author":"Kohen","date":"31 Aral\u0131k 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"L'ordonnance rendue le 16 juin 2025 par le juge de la mise en \u00e9tat du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux s'inscrit dans un contentieux de concurrence d\u00e9loyale impliquant une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9e dans l'immobilier et l'un de ses anciens mandataires ind\u00e9pendants. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre les limites proc\u00e9durales opposables aux strat\u00e9gies dilatoires dans\u2026","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":610579,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-3-novembre-2025-n25-01888\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 3 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01888","author":"Kohen","date":"19 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, par ordonnance du 3 novembre 2025, statue sur des demandes incidentes dans une proc\u00e9dure complexe. L'affaire, initialement p...","rel":"","context":"&quot;Jurisprudence&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"Jurisprudence","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-MgllRDA6GIA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":34479,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-20-juin-2025-n21-00095\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 20 juin 2025, n\u00b021\/00095","author":"Kohen","date":"6 Kas\u0131m 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, p\u00f4le social, 20 juin 2025, ordonne un sursis \u00e0 statuer en attendant l\u2019arr\u00eat de la cour d\u2019appel de Paris sur l\u2019appel dirig\u00e9 contre le jugement du 9 septembre 2024 ayant reconnu la faute inexcusable de l\u2019employeur. Le litige na\u00eet d\u2019une d\u00e9claration de maladie professionnelle hors\u2026","rel":"","context":"&quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathew-schwartz-onOdABjwC0M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":661556,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-19-janvier-2026-n25-00564\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 19 janvier 2026, n\u00b025\/00564","author":"Kohen","date":"23 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 19 janvier 2026, statue sur une demande de sursis \u00e0 statuer dans une instance civile. Une expertise dommages-ouvrage est ...","rel":"","context":"&quot;Jurisprudence&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"Jurisprudence","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":625187,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-19-janvier-2026-n24-02564\/","url_meta":{"origin":684509,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 19 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/02564","author":"Kohen","date":"20 Nisan 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 19 janvier 2026, statue sur une demande de sursis \u00e0 statuer. La proc\u00e9dure oppose une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 civile immobili\u00e8re en liquid...","rel":"","context":"&quot;Jurisprudence&quot; i\u00e7inde","block_context":{"text":"Jurisprudence","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/jurisprudence\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xavier-photography-Cgzlv8ZL188-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/684509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=684509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/684509\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9496"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=684509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=684509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=684509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}