1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/BNM v MGN Ltdrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ZHqrrDLCAi"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/bnm-v-mgn-ltd/">BNM v MGN Ltd</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/bnm-v-mgn-ltd/embed/#?secret=ZHqrrDLCAi" width="600" height="338" title="《 BNM v MGN Ltd 》—Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="ZHqrrDLCAi" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
1. The principal issue of law in this appeal is whether the former proportionality test in the old CPR 44.4(2) or the new proportionality test in the current CPR 44.3(2) and (5) applies on a standard basis of assessment to a pre-commencement funding arrangement as defined in the current CPR 48. 2. Expressed in less technical language and directed more...