1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/D v Erich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Xuk2eN7P5n"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/d-v-e-2/">D v E</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/d-v-e-2/embed/#?secret=Xuk2eN7P5n" width="600" height="338" title="《 D v E 》—Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="Xuk2eN7P5n" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
SUMMARY SEX DISCRIMINATION The Employment Tribunal erred when striking out the claim of indirect sex discrimination arising from the claimant’s dismissal, on the basis that dismissal was not a possible consequence of the application of the particular (reformulated) provision, criterion or practice (PCP) relied on. The claim was remitted to the Employment Tribunal. MATHEW GULLICK KC, DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE...