1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="n6rpsID3uu"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/lancaster-ors-v-peacock-qc/">Lancaster & Ors v Peacock QC</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/lancaster-ors-v-peacock-qc/embed/#?secret=n6rpsID3uu" width="600" height="338" title="《 Lancaster & Ors v Peacock QC 》—Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="n6rpsID3uu" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js </script> Mr Justice Fancourt and Master Kaye: 1. We have heard detailed argument, both orally and in careful written submissions for which we are both grateful, on the question of taking sample claimants in two separate claims which overlap to some extent on facts and law. There are 123 claimants altogether in the first claim (“the Peacock claim”) and 33 claimants...