1.0Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Parishttps://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/Z v Yrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="QZC6sV3THL"><a href="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/z-v-y/">Z v Y</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://kohenavocats.com/zh-hans/jurisprudences/z-v-y/embed/#?secret=QZC6sV3THL" width="600" height="338" title="《 Z v Y 》—Maître Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit pénal à Paris" data-secret="QZC6sV3THL" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://kohenavocats.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
SUMMARY Practice and procedure – disability discrimination – time limits The claimant’s claim had included a complaint of discriminatory constructive dismissal but clarification of her case, focused on the allegations of prohibited conduct, had overlooked this cause of action and the ET had declined to consider such a claim, going on to find that the matters of (pre-constructive dismissal) discrimination...