{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"Helsingin HO 30.11.2022 147947 - Petos","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mPzFqp0r5k\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-30-11-2022-147947-petos\/\">Helsingin HO 30.11.2022 147947 &#8211; Petos<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/helsingin-ho-30-11-2022-147947-petos\/embed\/#?secret=mPzFqp0r5k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a Helsingin HO 30.11.2022 147947 &#8211; Petos \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"mPzFqp0r5k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kysymys siit\u00e4, voitiinko A:n syyksi k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa luetut teot arvioida petosrikoksiksi ja t\u00f6rke\u00e4ksi tietomurroksi siit\u00e4 huolimatta, ett\u00e4 h\u00e4nen menettelyns\u00e4 olisi ollut mahdollista katsoa my\u00f6s per\u00e4tt\u00f6miksi vaarailmoituksiksi ja identiteettivarkaudeksi, joiden osalta syyteoikeus oli vanhentunut. Kysymys my\u00f6s tahallisuuden t\u00e4yttymisest\u00e4 petosrikoksissa ja oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin kestosta. HELSINGIN HOVIOIKEUDEN TUOMIO 30.11.2022 nro 147947 L\u00e4nsi-Uudenmaan k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus 23.6.2020 nro 122715 -- Selostus asiasta K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus..."}