{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KHO:2020:98 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yzRyEG1sFE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202098-utlanningsarende-2\/\">KHO:2020:98 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202098-utlanningsarende-2\/embed\/#?secret=yzRyEG1sFE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KHO:2020:98 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"yzRyEG1sFE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"\u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden, som var anknytningsperson, hade anl\u00e4nt till Finland som minder\u00e5rig asyls\u00f6kande och beviljats uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av alternativt skydd. \u00c4rendet g\u00e4llde fr\u00e5gan om Migrationsverket hade kunnat avsl\u00e5 f\u00f6r\u00e4ldrarnas uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kningar p\u00e5 den grunden att det fanns grundad anledning att misst\u00e4nka att de f\u00f6rs\u00f6kt kringg\u00e5 best\u00e4mmelserna om inresa genom att skicka sitt minder\u00e5riga barn till Finland i..."}