{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KHO:2022:63 - Valtioneuvoston asetus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vklPJ3vRmg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202263-valtioneuvoston-asetus-2\/\">KHO:2022:63 &#8211; Valtioneuvoston asetus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202263-valtioneuvoston-asetus-2\/embed\/#?secret=vklPJ3vRmg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KHO:2022:63 &#8211; Valtioneuvoston asetus \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"vklPJ3vRmg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra huruvida de besv\u00e4r som en n\u00e4ringsidkare anf\u00f6rt \u00f6ver statsr\u00e5dets f\u00f6rordningar g\u00e4llande tempor\u00e4ra begr\u00e4nsningar av f\u00f6rpl\u00e4gnadsr\u00f6relsers verksamhet i syfte att f\u00f6rhindra spridning av en smittsam sjukdom skulle pr\u00f6vas av h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen. Med statsr\u00e5dets f\u00f6rordningar hade givits best\u00e4mmelser g\u00e4llande bland annat det st\u00f6rsta till\u00e5tna antalet kunder samt \u00f6ppettider och tider f\u00f6r servering..."}