{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KHO:2025:66 - F\u00f6rvaltningstvistem\u00e5l","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7ZD9rOrIVO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202566-forvaltningstvistemal\/\">KHO:2025:66 &#8211; F\u00f6rvaltningstvistem\u00e5l<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202566-forvaltningstvistemal\/embed\/#?secret=7ZD9rOrIVO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KHO:2025:66 &#8211; F\u00f6rvaltningstvistem\u00e5l \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"7ZD9rOrIVO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kommunen yrkade i sin ans\u00f6kan att inleda en f\u00f6rvaltningstvist att v\u00e4lf\u00e4rdsomr\u00e5det f\u00f6rpliktas att till kommunen \u00e5terbetala s\u00e5dana kostnader som den tidigare samkommunen hade fakturerat f\u00f6r mycket f\u00f6r och som kommunen hade betalat. Med f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut fastst\u00e4lldes v\u00e4lf\u00e4rdsomr\u00e5dets skyldighet att till kommunen \u00e5terbetala de \u00e5tg\u00e4rdsbaserade ers\u00e4ttningar som samkommunen under perioden 1.1.2016 \u2014 31.12.2021 hade kr\u00e4vt in..."}