{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KHO:2025:70 - Statstj\u00e4nsteman","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"S5Memxfusd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202570-statstjansteman\/\">KHO:2025:70 &#8211; Statstj\u00e4nsteman<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202570-statstjansteman\/embed\/#?secret=S5Memxfusd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KHO:2025:70 &#8211; Statstj\u00e4nsteman \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"S5Memxfusd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade upph\u00e4vt det beslut som g\u00e4llde utn\u00e4mningen av Nationella audiovisuella institutets direkt\u00f6r. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g bland annat att den till tj\u00e4nsten utn\u00e4mnda personen inte uppfyllde beh\u00f6righetsvillkoret om f\u00f6rtrogenhet med \u00e4mbetsverkets verksamhetsomr\u00e5de och att utn\u00e4mningen inte grundade sig p\u00e5 en j\u00e4mlik och objektiv j\u00e4mf\u00f6relse av s\u00f6kandena. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att man med beh\u00f6righetsvillkoret om f\u00f6rtrogenhet med..."}