{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO 2\/2018 - Muutoksenhaku","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RxbyvcY4IZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-2-2018-muutoksenhaku\/\">KKO 2\/2018 &#8211; Muutoksenhaku<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-2-2018-muutoksenhaku\/embed\/#?secret=RxbyvcY4IZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO 2\/2018 &#8211; Muutoksenhaku \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"RxbyvcY4IZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli asettanut rikosasian vastaajan hakemuksesta p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksell\u00e4\u00e4n valituksen tekemiselle hovioikeuteen uuden m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ajan ja tiedottanut p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 my\u00f6s hakijan vastapuolille. Koska p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 ei selv\u00e4sti k\u00e4ynyt ilmi, ett\u00e4 uusi m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4aika ei koskenut hakijan vastapuolia, k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden olisi tullut tutkia alkuper\u00e4isen valitusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ajan j\u00e4lkeen saapunut asianomistajan valitus."}