{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO VL:2025-38 - Judiciaire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jrYZ1ORGaG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-38-judiciaire\/\">KKO VL:2025-38 &#8211; Judiciaire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-38-judiciaire\/embed\/#?secret=jrYZ1ORGaG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO VL:2025-38 &#8211; Judiciaire \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"jrYZ1ORGaG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Hovioikeus hylk\u00e4si A:han kohdistetut syytteet ja velvoitti valtion korvaamaan A:n kohtuulliset oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4- ja hovioikeudessa. Hovioikeus hylk\u00e4si A:n viiv\u00e4styskorkovaatimuksen lakiin perustumattomana, sill\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4ynnist\u00e4 rikosasioissa annetun lain mukaan korvaus maksetaan vasta, kun kysymys vastaajan syyllisyydest\u00e4 on lainvoimaisesti ratkaistu. Kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko valtio velvollinen suorittamaan sen maksettavaksi tuomituille oikeudenk\u00e4yntikuluille vaadittua viiv\u00e4styskorkoa. Valituslupakortti sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 kuvauksen siit\u00e4 kysymyksest\u00e4, johon..."}