{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO VL:2025-70 - Judiciaire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fvVaYVCqwk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-70-judiciaire\/\">KKO VL:2025-70 &#8211; Judiciaire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-70-judiciaire\/embed\/#?secret=fvVaYVCqwk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO VL:2025-70 &#8211; Judiciaire \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"fvVaYVCqwk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ulosottolaitos oli takavarikoinut samaan konserniin kuuluvien ulkomaisten yhti\u00f6iden Suomessa olevia varoja pannessaan t\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6\u00f6n ulkoministeri\u00f6n pyynn\u00f6n t\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6\u00f6npanosta Ukrainan alueellista koskemattomuutta, suvereniteettia ja itsen\u00e4isyytt\u00e4 heikent\u00e4vien tai uhkaavien toimien johdosta m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tt\u00e4vist\u00e4 rajoittavista toimenpiteist\u00e4 annetun neuvoston asetuksen N:o 269\/2014 perusteella. Hovioikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 konsernissa k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n otettujen, muun ohella yhti\u00f6iden varallisuuden siirtymist\u00e4 pakotteiden kohteena olevalle henkil\u00f6lle est\u00e4vien suojamenetelmien vuoksi varojen..."}