{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO VL:2025-73 - Judiciaire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qA1f970h5a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-73-judiciaire\/\">KKO VL:2025-73 &#8211; Judiciaire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-vl2025-73-judiciaire\/embed\/#?secret=qA1f970h5a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO VL:2025-73 &#8211; Judiciaire \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"qA1f970h5a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Hovioikeus oli ulosottovelallisen valituksesta kumonnut asunto-osakkeiden myynti\u00e4 koskevan Ulosottolaitoksen p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsoen kihlakunnanvoudin hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4n korkeimman tarjouksen alittaneen selv\u00e4sti k\u00e4yv\u00e4n hinnan paikkakunnalla. Hovioikeus ei ollut varannut asunto-osakkeiden ostajalle tilaisuutta tulla valituksen johdosta kuulluksi. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta. Valituslupakortti sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 kuvauksen siit\u00e4 kysymyksest\u00e4, johon liittyen asiassa on my\u00f6nnetty valituslupa. Sen sis\u00e4lt\u00f6 ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eik\u00e4 rajoita asian..."}