{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO:2017:38 - Ty\u00f6sopimus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BUR5SXE4IU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko201738-tyosopimus\/\">KKO:2017:38 &#8211; Ty\u00f6sopimus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko201738-tyosopimus\/embed\/#?secret=BUR5SXE4IU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO:2017:38 &#8211; Ty\u00f6sopimus \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"BUR5SXE4IU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantaja oli irtisanonut A:n toistaiseksi voimassa olleen ty\u00f6sopimuksen taloudellisista ja tuotannollisista syist\u00e4, koska A:n ty\u00f6teht\u00e4v\u00e4t olivat olennaisesti ja pysyv\u00e4sti v\u00e4hentyneet. Ty\u00f6nantaja oli ennen A:n irtisanomista ja sen j\u00e4lkeen ottanut samankaltaisiin ty\u00f6teht\u00e4viin sellaisia ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6it\u00e4, joita oli tarvittaessa kutsuttu t\u00f6ihin lyhyisiin m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4aikaisiin ty\u00f6suhteisiin. Kysymys siit\u00e4, mit\u00e4 merkityst\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4aikaisen lis\u00e4ty\u00f6voiman k\u00e4yt\u00f6ll\u00e4 oli irtisanomisen perusteen laillisuutta arvioitaessa. Kysymys my\u00f6s..."}