{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO:2020:95 - Tj\u00e4nstebrott","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"efsDS9lost\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202095-tjanstebrott\/\">KKO:2020:95 &#8211; Tj\u00e4nstebrott<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202095-tjanstebrott\/embed\/#?secret=efsDS9lost\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO:2020:95 &#8211; Tj\u00e4nstebrott \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"efsDS9lost\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Polismannen A hade tillr\u00e4knats fem brott mot tj\u00e4nsteplikt samt brott mot tj\u00e4nstehemlighet. Fr\u00e5ga om best\u00e4mmande av straff f\u00f6r A. Poliisimies A:n syyksi oli luettu viisi virkavelvollisuuden rikkomista sek\u00e4 virkasalaisuuden rikkominen. Kysymys rangaistuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4misest\u00e4 A:lle. Asian k\u00e4sittely alemmissa oikeuksissa Helsingin k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden tuomio 29.12.2016 nro 154477 ja Helsingin hovioikeuden tuomio 27.6.2019 nro 128376 kuvataan tarpeellisilta osin Korkeimman..."}