{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO:2025:13 - Osakeyhti\u00f6","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hvpviWv6bY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202513-osakeyhtio\/\">KKO:2025:13 &#8211; Osakeyhti\u00f6<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202513-osakeyhtio\/embed\/#?secret=hvpviWv6bY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO:2025:13 &#8211; Osakeyhti\u00f6 \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"hvpviWv6bY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Osakeyhti\u00f6n yhti\u00f6kokous p\u00e4\u00e4tti ottaa yhti\u00f6j\u00e4rjestykseen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 osakkeenomistaja, jonka osuus yhti\u00f6n osakkeiden tuottamasta \u00e4\u00e4nim\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4st\u00e4 saavutti tai ylitti 30 prosenttia tai 50 prosenttia, oli velvollinen lunastamaan muiden osakkeenomistajien vaatimuksesta n\u00e4iden osakkeet. Lunastushinta oli yhti\u00f6j\u00e4rjestyksess\u00e4 tarkemmin m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tyll\u00e4 tavalla vahvistettava osakkeiden arvo lis\u00e4ttyn\u00e4 15 prosentilla. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla, ett\u00e4 yhti\u00f6j\u00e4rjestysm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys oli osakeyhti\u00f6lain 3 luvun..."}