{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"KKO:2025:98 - Vahingonkorvaus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8DxzbGTj7j\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202598-vahingonkorvaus\/\">KKO:2025:98 &#8211; Vahingonkorvaus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko202598-vahingonkorvaus\/embed\/#?secret=8DxzbGTj7j\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a KKO:2025:98 &#8211; Vahingonkorvaus \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"8DxzbGTj7j\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Vapaa-ajan k\u00e4yt\u00f6ss\u00e4 ollut rakennus oli tuhoutunut korjauskelvottomaksi. Korkeimman oikeuden ratkaisusta ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla vahingonkorvaus tuhoutuneesta rakennuksesta m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ttiin uuden vastaavan rakennuksen rakentamiskustannusten perusteella ja ottamalla v\u00e4hennyksen\u00e4 huomioon tasonparannuksesta ja rakennuksen osien k\u00e4ytt\u00f6i\u00e4n pidentymisest\u00e4 aiheutuva hy\u00f6ty, vaikka n\u00e4in m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty korvaus ylitti tuhoutuneen rakennuksen arvioidun myyntihinnan. VahL 5 luku 5 \u00a7 En fritidsbyggnad hade f\u00f6rst\u00f6rts s\u00e5 att den inte..."}