{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2016:104 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l9cjSyiFkr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-2016104-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2016:104 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-2016104-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=l9cjSyiFkr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2016:104 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"l9cjSyiFkr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeuden lausuntopyynn\u00f6ss\u00e4 esitettiin ensiksi kysymys siit\u00e4, kuuluiko asia yleisen tuomioistuimen vai ty\u00f6tuomioistuimen toimivaltaan. T\u00e4m\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely\u00e4 koskeva kysymys ei kuulunut niihin asioihin, joista ty\u00f6tuomioistuin voi antaa lausunnon ty\u00f6tuomioistuimesta annetun lain 39 \u00a7:n mukaan (n\u00e4in esim. TT 1979:3 ja TT 2013:119) Ty\u00f6tuomioistuimeen toimitetuista asiakirjoista k\u00e4vi ilmi, ett\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa vireill\u00e4 olleiden riita-asioiden osapuolina k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa olivat ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen ty\u00f6ehtosopimuslain nojalla..."}