{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2019:119 - Lakko","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bLu5PWW5QW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-2019119-lakko\/\">TT 2019:119 &#8211; Lakko<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-2019119-lakko\/embed\/#?secret=bLu5PWW5QW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2019:119 &#8211; Lakko \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"bLu5PWW5QW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6taistelun syyn\u00e4 oli ty\u00f6nantajayhti\u00f6n esimiesten ty\u00f6sopimusten irtisanomisia koskenut p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s. Ty\u00f6taistelu kohdistui siten ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ykseen ty\u00f6nantajan oikeudesta johtaa ja jakaa ty\u00f6t\u00e4 sek\u00e4 ottaa ty\u00f6h\u00f6n ja erottaa ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6it\u00e4. Asiassa j\u00e4i n\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4, ett\u00e4 ammattiliitto tai sen edustajat olisivat jollain tavalla osallistuneet ty\u00f6taistelun toimeenpanemiseen. Kanne hyl\u00e4ttiin silt\u00e4 osin kuin siin\u00e4 oli vaadittu ammattiliiton tuomitsemista hyvityssakkoon ty\u00f6rauhavelvollisuuden rikkomisesta. Vastauksessa my\u00f6nnettiin,..."}