{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2019:97 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"43NsXhT0o5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-201997-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2019:97 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-201997-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=43NsXhT0o5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2019:97 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"43NsXhT0o5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Lausunnossa katsottiin, ett\u00e4 kuorma-autoalan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen osana noudatettavan irtisanomissuojasopimuksen ty\u00f6voiman v\u00e4hent\u00e4misj\u00e4rjestyst\u00e4 koskeva m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys on oikeudellisesti sitova. M\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen loppuosa on kuitenkin kirjoitettu siten, ett\u00e4 se liittojen yhteisen kannan mukaisesti vain ohjaa ty\u00f6nantajaa kiinnitt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n huomiota my\u00f6s ty\u00f6suhteen kestoaikaan ja ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n huoltovelvollisuuden m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4n. T\u00e4rke\u00e4n ammattity\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n k\u00e4sitteelle ei ollut liittojen yhteisen tulkinnan kautta muodostunut kuorma-autoalalla sovellettavaa erityist\u00e4 sis\u00e4lt\u00f6\u00e4. Lausunnossa viitattiin..."}