{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2020:4 - Ep\u00e4rehellisyys","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hdKwJfc3QO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20204-eparehellisyys\/\">TT 2020:4 &#8211; Ep\u00e4rehellisyys<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20204-eparehellisyys\/embed\/#?secret=hdKwJfc3QO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2020:4 &#8211; Ep\u00e4rehellisyys \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"hdKwJfc3QO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Luottamusmiehen\u00e4 toimiva myym\u00e4l\u00e4ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli menetellyt ty\u00f6nantajayhti\u00f6n toimintaohjeiden ja k\u00e4ynniss\u00e4 olleen asiakaskampanjan s\u00e4\u00e4nt\u00f6jen vastaisesti. Asian selvittelyss\u00e4 ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli esitt\u00e4nyt ty\u00f6toveriaan kohtaan syyt\u00f6ksen vastaavasta menettelyst\u00e4. Syyt\u00f6s oli asiaa tutkittaessa osoittautunut aiheettomaksi. Kokonaisuutena arvioiden ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n katsottiin menettelyll\u00e4\u00e4n myym\u00e4l\u00e4ss\u00e4 ja asian selvittelyss\u00e4 rikkoneen ty\u00f6nantajan ja ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n v\u00e4list\u00e4 luottamusta niin vakavalla tavalla, ettei ty\u00f6nantajalta voitu kohtuudella edellytt\u00e4\u00e4 ty\u00f6suhteen jatkamista edes..."}