{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2020:46 - Irtisanomissuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4wn4bsjg4F\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202046-irtisanomissuoja\/\">TT 2020:46 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202046-irtisanomissuoja\/embed\/#?secret=4wn4bsjg4F\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2020:46 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"4wn4bsjg4F\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantaja oli ilmoittanut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle t\u00e4m\u00e4n ty\u00f6sopimuksen purkautumisesta luvattoman poissaolon vuoksi. Tuomiossa katsottiin n\u00e4ytetyksi, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli sopinut palkattomasta vapaasta ty\u00f6nantajansa kanssa. Ty\u00f6nantaja oli ilmoittanut palkattoman vapaan peruutetuksi kaksi p\u00e4iv\u00e4\u00e4 ennen loman alkamista, mink\u00e4 ei katsottu olleen vallitsevissa olosuhteissa ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n kannalta kohtuullista. Ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4ll\u00e4 oli siten ollut p\u00e4tev\u00e4 syy poissaololleen eik\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantajalla ollut perustetta pit\u00e4\u00e4 h\u00e4nen ty\u00f6sopimustaan..."}