{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2020:95 - Sairausloma","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"22hOIrM8of\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202095-sairausloma\/\">TT 2020:95 &#8211; Sairausloma<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202095-sairausloma\/embed\/#?secret=22hOIrM8of\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2020:95 &#8211; Sairausloma \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"22hOIrM8of\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ykset ty\u00f6nantajan oikeudesta antaa 18 lomap\u00e4iv\u00e4\u00e4 ylitt\u00e4v\u00e4 loman osa yhdenjaksoisena muulloin kuin lomakauden aikana, jos se oli yrityksen toiminnan kannalta tarpeellista, sek\u00e4 t\u00e4llaisesta siirretyst\u00e4 vuosilomasta ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle maksettavasta hyvityksest\u00e4. Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4ll\u00e4 oikeus ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen mukaiseen siirretyn vuosiloman lomarahaan, kun h\u00e4nen vuosilomansa oli siirretty osittain lomakauden ulkopuolelle h\u00e4nen sairauslomansa takia. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi..."}