{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:55 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6FFMBq4Zs6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202155-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2021:55 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202155-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=6FFMBq4Zs6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:55 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"6FFMBq4Zs6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6tuomioistuimella ei ollut perusteita poiketa maa- ja vesirakennusalan ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten liittojen yksimielisest\u00e4 kannasta. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi n\u00e4in ollen lausuntonaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen mukainen p\u00e4ivitt\u00e4isten matkakustannusten korvaus maksettiin riippumatta ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle aiheutuneesta konkreettisesta kustannuksesta. Sit\u00e4 ei kuitenkaan maksettu, jos ty\u00f6nantaja oli j\u00e4rjest\u00e4nyt kuljetuksen. Kuljetuksen j\u00e4rjest\u00e4misell\u00e4 tarkoitettiin esimerkiksi sit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja antoi ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n auton ja maksoi polttoaineen. Arviointiin ei..."}