{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:57 - Tukity\u00f6taistelu","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BPF8aD7Hbf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202157-tukityotaistelu\/\">TT 2021:57 &#8211; Tukity\u00f6taistelu<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202157-tukityotaistelu\/embed\/#?secret=BPF8aD7Hbf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:57 &#8211; Tukity\u00f6taistelu \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"BPF8aD7Hbf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kanteessa oli kyse niin sanotun primaarity\u00f6taistelun tukemiseksi toimeenpannuista tukity\u00f6taisteluista. Tuomiossa todettiin, ett\u00e4 tukity\u00f6taistelua, silloin kun sill\u00e4 on tuettu ty\u00f6ehtosopimuslain mukaan laillista ty\u00f6taistelua, on pidetty sek\u00e4 oikeuskirjallisuudessa ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6tuomioistuimen ratkaisuk\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6ss\u00e4 sallittuna edellytt\u00e4en, ett\u00e4 sill\u00e4 ei ole pyritty osaksikaan vaikuttamaan omaan ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen tai ett\u00e4 tukijan oma ty\u00f6ehtosopimus ei tukitoimien johdosta ole olennaisella tavalla menett\u00e4nyt merkityst\u00e4\u00e4n ty\u00f6rauhan turvaajana...."}