{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:60 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"T0JEU36ARF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202160-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2021:60 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202160-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=T0JEU36ARF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:60 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"T0JEU36ARF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Lausuntoasiassa oli kysymys muun muassa siit\u00e4, oliko tulkinnan kohteena olevassa ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa rajoitettu niin kutsutun jatkuvan neuvottelumenettelyn k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00e4 yhteistoimintamenettelyss\u00e4 ja miten ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4, joka koski neuvottelumenettely\u00e4 ty\u00f6voiman k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00e4 v\u00e4hennett\u00e4ess\u00e4, tuli tulkita. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten liittojen yhtenevien kannanottojen perusteella, ett\u00e4 niin kutsutun jatkuvan neuvottelumenettelyn k\u00e4yt\u00f6st\u00e4 ei ollut sovittu ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa mit\u00e4\u00e4n. Riidanalaista m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4 ei voitu tulkita siten,..."}