{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:69 - Ty\u00f6aika","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7xMsBe2wUF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202169-tyoaika\/\">TT 2021:69 &#8211; Ty\u00f6aika<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202169-tyoaika\/embed\/#?secret=7xMsBe2wUF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:69 &#8211; Ty\u00f6aika \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"7xMsBe2wUF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kanteessa vaadittiin vahvistettavaksi ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen tulkinta, jonka mukaan tilap\u00e4iselle ahtaajalle oli maksettava viikkoylity\u00f6korvaus lauantaina teht\u00e4v\u00e4st\u00e4 ty\u00f6st\u00e4 silloin, kun ty\u00f6nantaja sovelsi ty\u00f6aikamuotoa, jossa lauantaille ei sijoitettu s\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6llist\u00e4 ty\u00f6aikaa. Tulkinnan mukaan tilap\u00e4inen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 saisi ylity\u00f6korvauksen tehdess\u00e4\u00e4n ty\u00f6t\u00e4 lauantaina riippumatta siit\u00e4, mik\u00e4 h\u00e4nen ty\u00f6aikansa samalla viikolla oli ollut. Ty\u00f6nantajapuoli katsoi, ett\u00e4 tilap\u00e4isen ahtaajan viikkoylity\u00f6n syntyminen edellytti sit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 h\u00e4nen..."}