{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:94 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ARxy6cVCLD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202194-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2021:94 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202194-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=ARxy6cVCLD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:94 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"ARxy6cVCLD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nantajayhti\u00f6 harjoitti elokuvien vuokrausta ja irtomakeisten myynti\u00e4. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa vireill\u00e4 olevassa asiassa kantajina olevien ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden ty\u00f6teht\u00e4v\u00e4t olivat muodostuneet p\u00e4\u00e4osin pakkauksettomien irtomakeisten esillepanosta, tarjoiluastioiden puhtaanapidosta sek\u00e4 asiakaspalvelusta ja myynnist\u00e4. Kysymys oli siit\u00e4, mit\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimusta kantajien ty\u00f6suhteisiin oli sovellettava. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi asiassa j\u00e4\u00e4neen n\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4, ett\u00e4 yhti\u00f6n ja er\u00e4\u00e4n ammattiliiton v\u00e4lille olisi vastoin ammattiliiton kiist\u00e4mist\u00e4 syntynyt yrityskohtainen ty\u00f6ehtosopimus. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin..."}