{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2021:98 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Uvj8W6Ez8W\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202198-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2021:98 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202198-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=Uvj8W6Ez8W\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2021:98 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"Uvj8W6Ez8W\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Kiinteist\u00f6palvelualan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6it\u00e4 koskevan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen osana noudatetaan niin sanottua talonmiesliitett\u00e4, joka sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 muun ohella m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle maksettavasta p\u00e4ivystyskorvauksesta. Lausuntoasiassa katsottiin ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten liittojen yhtenevien kannanottojen perusteella, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen mukainen pistepalkkausj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4 ei vaikuttanut p\u00e4ivystyskorvauksen maksamiseen ja ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa ei ollut muuta m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4, jossa olisi sovittu tavoitettavuudesta puhelimella. Viel\u00e4 todettiin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa ei ollut m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4 siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 sopimus..."}