{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2022:23 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UZJLnTAWPP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202223-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2022:23 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202223-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=UZJLnTAWPP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2022:23 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"UZJLnTAWPP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten yksimielisen kannan mukaan k\u00e4sitteell\u00e4 \u201dhenkil\u00f6st\u00f6ryhm\u00e4\u201d viitattiin vakiintuneeseen kolmijakoon ylemm\u00e4t toimihenkil\u00f6t, toimihenkil\u00f6t ja ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4t. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuimella ei ollut perusteita poiketa ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten liittojen yhteisest\u00e4 kannasta. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi n\u00e4in olleen lausuntonaan, ett\u00e4 kysymyksess\u00e4 olevia ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksi\u00e4 oli tulkittava edell\u00e4 kerrotulla tavalla. Asia Lausuntoasia Kuultavat Rakennustuoteteollisuus RTT ry Ammattiliitto Pro ry TY\u00d6EHTOSOPIMUKSEN M\u00c4\u00c4R\u00c4YKSET Rakennustuoteteollisuus RTT ry:n ja..."}