{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2022:73 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TaDSw0vk48\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202273-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2022:73 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202273-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=TaDSw0vk48\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2022:73 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"TaDSw0vk48\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa oli vireill\u00e4 riita-asia, jossa vastaajana ollut ty\u00f6nantajayhti\u00f6 oli ty\u00f6ehtosopimuslain nojalla sidottu tekstiili- ja muotialan toimihenkil\u00f6sopimukseen. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus pyysi ty\u00f6tuomioistuimelta lausuntoa siit\u00e4, tuliko k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa kantajina olleiden ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden ty\u00f6suhteissa soveltaa edell\u00e4 mainittua ty\u00f6ehtosopimusta vai yleissitovuuden perusteella kaupan ty\u00f6ehtosopimusta. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi, ett\u00e4 soveltamisalansa puolesta kumpikin edell\u00e4 mainituista ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksista voi tulla sovellettavaksi silloin, kun kysymys oli myyj\u00e4n ty\u00f6st\u00e4 tekstiili-..."}