{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2022:8 - Irtisanomissuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9Ia6Cc3tRl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20228-irtisanomissuoja\/\">TT 2022:8 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20228-irtisanomissuoja\/embed\/#?secret=9Ia6Cc3tRl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2022:8 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"9Ia6Cc3tRl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Yhti\u00f6 oli tehnyt tuotantosuunnan muutoksen paperinvalmistuksesta kartongin valmistukseen. Muutoksen j\u00e4lkeen tehdas ty\u00f6llisti merkitt\u00e4v\u00e4sti v\u00e4hemm\u00e4n henkil\u00f6it\u00e4 kuin aikaisemmin. Ty\u00f6nantaja oli irtisanonut muun ohessa kahden osastonluottamusmiehen ty\u00f6suhteet. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi selvitetyksi, ett\u00e4 n\u00e4iden luottamusmiesten edustamia t\u00f6it\u00e4 ei ollut en\u00e4\u00e4 ollut yhti\u00f6ss\u00e4 tuotantosuunnan muuttamisen j\u00e4lkeen. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi kuitenkin j\u00e4\u00e4neen n\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4, ett\u00e4 luottamusmiehille ei olisi voitu j\u00e4rjest\u00e4\u00e4 heid\u00e4n ammattitaitoaan vastaavaa..."}