{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2023:25 - Lakko","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BJcye6f6Tz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202325-lakko\/\">TT 2023:25 &#8211; Lakko<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202325-lakko\/embed\/#?secret=BJcye6f6Tz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2023:25 &#8211; Lakko \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"BJcye6f6Tz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6taistelun syyn\u00e4 oli ty\u00f6nantajan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s teett\u00e4\u00e4 er\u00e4it\u00e4 t\u00f6it\u00e4 alihankkijalla samaan aikaan kun ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6it\u00e4 lomautettiin. Ty\u00f6taistelun katsottiin kohdistuvan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ykseen ty\u00f6nantajan ty\u00f6njohto-oikeudesta. P\u00e4\u00e4luottamusmies oli ilmoittanut lakosta ja sen syist\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantajalle ty\u00f6taistelun alkaessa. P\u00e4\u00e4luottamusmies ja ty\u00f6suojeluvaltuutettu olivat my\u00f6s osallistuneet ty\u00f6taisteluun. Ammattiosasto vastasi edustajiensa toiminnasta ja oli siten rikkonut ty\u00f6rauhavelvollisuutensa. Ammattiliitto oli ollut lakosta tiedon saatuaan yhteydess\u00e4 luottamusmieheen...."}