{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2023:5 - Irtisanominen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BJ9aoL6ZYM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20235-irtisanominen\/\">TT 2023:5 &#8211; Irtisanominen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20235-irtisanominen\/embed\/#?secret=BJ9aoL6ZYM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2023:5 &#8211; Irtisanominen \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"BJ9aoL6ZYM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"\u200dK\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa oli vireill\u00e4 ty\u00f6suhteen irtisanomista koskeva asia. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus pyysi ty\u00f6tuomioistuimelta lausuntoa siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6nantajayhti\u00f6ll\u00e4 velvollisuus maksaa irtisanotulle ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen mukainen lomaraha ty\u00f6suhteen p\u00e4\u00e4ttyess\u00e4 kesken olleen lomanm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ytymisvuoden lomakorvauksen yhteydess\u00e4. Ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa oli muun ohella sovittu, ett\u00e4 toimihenkil\u00f6lle suoritetaan lomarahana 50 prosenttia h\u00e4nen vuosilomapalkastaan ja ett\u00e4 lomaraha maksetaan my\u00f6s mahdollisen lomakorvauksen yhteydess\u00e4, jos ty\u00f6suhde p\u00e4\u00e4ttyy muusta kuin ylemm\u00e4st\u00e4..."}