{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2023:79 - Irtisanomissuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LQF9m3B11a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202379-irtisanomissuoja\/\">TT 2023:79 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202379-irtisanomissuoja\/embed\/#?secret=LQF9m3B11a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2023:79 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"LQF9m3B11a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Yhti\u00f6 sulki yhden tehtaistaan pysyv\u00e4sti. Sen johdosta tehtaalla p\u00e4\u00e4ttyi 448 ty\u00f6teht\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4. Irtisanottujen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden joukossa oli er\u00e4\u00e4n osaston luottamusmies. Suljettavalta tehtaalta siirrettiin 20 ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4\u00e4 yhti\u00f6n toiselle tehtaalle, ja vajaat 20 ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4\u00e4 sijoitettiin suljetulle tehtaalle j\u00e4\u00e4neeseen niin kutsuttuun j\u00e4lkihoitoryhm\u00e4\u00e4n. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin katsoi selvitetyksi, ett\u00e4 tehtaan sulkemisen my\u00f6t\u00e4 my\u00f6s luottamusmiehen edustamien ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden ty\u00f6 oli p\u00e4\u00e4ttynyt riidanalaisessa ty\u00f6ehtosopimusm\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksess\u00e4 tarkoitetulla tavalla..."}