{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2024:36 - Ateriakorvaus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JeLPZkaN1B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202436-ateriakorvaus\/\">TT 2024:36 &#8211; Ateriakorvaus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202436-ateriakorvaus\/embed\/#?secret=JeLPZkaN1B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2024:36 &#8211; Ateriakorvaus \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"JeLPZkaN1B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin hyv\u00e4ksyi tuomiosta tarkemmin ilmenevin perustein kantajan vahvistamisvaatimukset siit\u00e4, ettei henkil\u00f6st\u00f6ruokailun tukeminen Epassilla vastannut sovellettavassa ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksessa tarkoitettua tavanomaista ruokailupaikkaa ja ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantaja oli Epassin k\u00e4ytett\u00e4viss\u00e4 olosta riippumatta velvollinen maksamaan ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ille ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen mukaisten edellytysten t\u00e4yttyess\u00e4 ateriakorvauksen. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin hylk\u00e4si kantajan vahvistamisvaatimuksen siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ykset eiv\u00e4t est\u00e4neet ateriakorvausten maksamista verollisena. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin tuomitsi ty\u00f6nantajan ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen tieten rikkomisesta ja..."}