{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2025:16 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OhsyzgO2n5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202516-lausuntoasia-2\/\">TT 2025:16 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202516-lausuntoasia-2\/embed\/#?secret=OhsyzgO2n5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2025:16 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"OhsyzgO2n5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Lausuntoasiassa oli kysymys osittaisella vanhempainvapaalla olleen j\u00e4rjest\u00e4ytym\u00e4tt\u00f6m\u00e4n virkamiehen vuosilomapalkan m\u00e4\u00e4rittelyst\u00e4. Valtion ty\u00f6markkinalaitoksen ja palkansaajaj\u00e4rjest\u00f6jen v\u00e4lill\u00e4 vallitsi erimielisyys siit\u00e4, oliko valtion vuosilomasopimuksen tulkinta pakottavan lains\u00e4\u00e4d\u00e4nn\u00f6n vastainen silt\u00e4 osin kuin osittaisella vanhempainvapaalla olevien vuosilomapalkka m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ytyi samalla tavoin kuin muiden osa-aikaisten ja eri perustein kuin kokoaikaisella vanhempainvapaalla olevien. Ty\u00f6tuomioistuin totesi, ett\u00e4 kysymyksen ratkaiseminen ei edellytt\u00e4nyt erityist\u00e4 ty\u00f6ehto- tai..."}