{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2025:24 - Irtisanomissuoja","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GR7DOC9LGI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202524-irtisanomissuoja-2\/\">TT 2025:24 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-202524-irtisanomissuoja-2\/embed\/#?secret=GR7DOC9LGI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2025:24 &#8211; Irtisanomissuoja \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"GR7DOC9LGI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Ty\u00f6nan\u00adtaja oli irtisanonut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n ty\u00f6sopimuksen sen takia, miten ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4 oli k\u00e4ytt\u00e4y\u00adtynyt ja toiminut lakkovahtina laillisen ty\u00f6taistelun aikana. Ty\u00f6nantaja ei ollut antanut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4lle varoi\u00adtusta ennen irtisa\u00adno\u00admista. Tuomiosta ilmenevin perustein katsottiin, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nan\u00adtajalla ei ollut ollut ty\u00f6ehtosopimuksen osana noudatettavassa irtisanomissuo\u00adjaa ja lomau\u00adtusta koskevassa sopimuksessa tarkoitettua asiallista ja painavaa syyt\u00e4 irti\u00adsanoa ty\u00f6sopi\u00admusta. Vahvistusvaatimus hyv\u00e4ksyttiin, ja ty\u00f6nantaja velvoitettiin suorittamaan..."}