{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"TT 2025:9 - Lausuntoasia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rWZWaUFH4S\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20259-lausuntoasia\/\">TT 2025:9 &#8211; Lausuntoasia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/tt-20259-lausuntoasia\/embed\/#?secret=rWZWaUFH4S\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a TT 2025:9 &#8211; Lausuntoasia \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"rWZWaUFH4S\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Hallinto-oikeudessa vireill\u00e4 olevassa asiassa kysymys oli siit\u00e4, mink\u00e4 hinnoittelutunnuksen mukaan lehtorin viran palkka m\u00e4\u00e4riteltiin. Kunta-alan opetushenkil\u00f6st\u00f6n virka- ja ty\u00f6ehtosopimukseen osallisten yhdenmukaisen kannan mukaisesti ty\u00f6tuomioistuin lausuntonaan katsoi, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6nantajalla oli vapaa harkintavalta m\u00e4\u00e4ritell\u00e4 hinnoittelutunnuksessa tarkoitettu soveltuva ylempi korkeakoulututkinto tai ylempi ammattikorkeakoulututkinto erityisopetusta annettaessa. Ty\u00f6nantajan oli kuitenkin noudatettava omaa k\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6\u00e4\u00e4n soveltuvan tutkinnon m\u00e4\u00e4rittelyss\u00e4 johdonmukaisesti ja tasapuolisesti henkil\u00f6st\u00f6n..."}